Somali Refugees in Minnesota: Net Impact of the 30-Year Refugee Experiment

A sweeping analysis of Somali refugees in Minnesota (U.S.) after resettlement

DISCLAIMER: It is critical to evaluate each person as an individual, including Somalis. That said, turning a blind-eye to group traits/behaviors (likely downstream from uniquely evolved genetics) in refugees (e.g. clannishness, IQ/intellect, antisocial/criminal tendencies, etc.) is pure lunacy when you enable these groups to become U.S. citizens with zero filtration system in place. Sadly, as of 2025, all preliminary evidence indicates that Somalian refugees as a group have thus far been an unmitigated disaster for the state of Minnesota and the broader U.S.

I. Introduction: The Failed Experiment

For the past three decades, the State of Minnesota has served as the backdrop for one of the most significant and transformative demographic experiments in modern American history.

What began in the early 1990s as a humanitarian gesture—the resettlement of refugees fleeing the collapse of the Siad Barre regime and the subsequent civil war in Somalia—has evolved into a permanent and profound alteration of the state’s social, economic, and political fabric.

While immigration policy is frequently debated in the abstract terms of multiculturalism or moral obligation, the tangible impacts of this specific migration flow offer a distinct and troubling case study in the challenges of absorbing a population with deep socioeconomic, cultural, and educational deficits into a modern Western welfare state.

This report moves beyond superficial narratives of diversity to examine the structural realities revealed by federal indictments, state fiscal audits, law enforcement databases, and census microdata.

The data indicates that the rapid settlement of this demographic has not resulted in the seamless assimilation predicted by early advocates. Instead, it has catalyzed a multifaceted crisis characterized by fiscal insolvency, systemic financial malfeasance, and the deterioration of public safety.

The evidence suggests that Minnesota is not merely experiencing transitional “growing pains,” but is witnessing the establishment of a “parallel society” or “state within a state”.

This parallel structure is defined by four critical vectors of instability:

1. Systemic Fraud: The emergence of a sophisticated, ethnically networked “fraud industrial complex” that has weaponized the state’s high-trust social safety net. Investigations have uncovered schemes siphoning an estimated $1 billion from taxpayer-funded programs—most notably the “Feeding Our Future” scandal and burgeoning Medicaid fraud rings—to siphon billions of taxpayer dollars, with significant capital flight remitted to foreign entities.

2. Fiscal Insolvency: A deep, persistent imbalance where the community’s consumption of public resources (welfare, subsidized housing, and state-funded healthcare) mathematically overwhelms its tax contributions. This deficit is structural, driven by low workforce participation, minimal educational attainment, and hyper-fertility.

3. National Security Threats: The distinction of Minnesota becoming the primary North American recruitment hub for foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). The community has produced dozens of recruits for Al-Shabaab and ISIS, including the first documented American suicide bomber, creating a unique and permanent security liability for the state.

4. Cultural Incompatibility: The transplantation of clan-based social structures and “abnormal” cultural norms—including Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), polygamy, and resistance to secular education—that conflict with established American laws and social cohesion.

This report offers a cold assessment, stripping away political euphemisms to present a comprehensive ledger of the costs borne by the Minnesota taxpayer.

It projects that without a radical reassessment of resettlement policies, fraud prevention, and law enforcement strategies, the state faces a future of deepened social stratification, where a politically unified but economically dependent ethnic bloc increasingly dictates state resource allocation.

---

II. The Demographic Engine: Replacement & Expansion

Minnesota now hosts the largest Somali community in the United States, the product of three decades of refugee resettlement, family reunification, and follow‑on migration into an increasingly dense network centered on the Twin Cities. (Star Tribune)

According to recent Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) data, there are roughly 107,000–108,000 residents of Somali descent in Minnesota — about 2% of the state’s population — with an estimated 84,000 in the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro and nearly 50,000 in Hennepin County alone.

Earlier estimates from the Minnesota State Demographic Center in 2016 placed the number much lower, at 40,200–52,400, while Somali community leaders at the time argued the true figure might already be closer to 80,000. (Wikipedia)

Whatever the exact count, the composition of the community is clear and important:

1. About 58% of Somalis in Minnesota are U.S.-born.

2. Among the foreign-born Somali population, roughly 87% are naturalized U.S. citizens.

So the demographic engine described here is driven mainly by citizens and their U.S.-born children, not a transient, foreign population.

At the same time, the native-born white population is aging and has below‑replacement fertility, while Somali and other BIPOC communities are both younger and, on average, more fertile.

Minnesota’s own demography office projects that White Minnesotans will decline in absolute number by mid‑century, while Somalis and other non‑white groups continue to grow, reshaping the future labor force and electorate. (mn.gov)

2.1 The Magnitude of Settlement: Official Numbers vs. Community Reality

Pinning down the exact size of the Somali population is hard because the Census and ACS do not offer “Somali” as a race category; people select “Black/African-American” and optionally write in “Somali” as an ancestry or report Somali as their home language.

Minnesota Compass, which reconstructs a “Somali” category from ancestry and language data, explicitly flags that its estimates are subject to classification limitations. (MNC)

Even with those caveats, the trend is clear:

• Early 2010s–2016: The Minnesota Demographer’s Office estimated 40,200–52,400 Somalis, while acknowledging community estimates as high as 80,000.

• Late 2010s: By 2018, ACS data showed about 43,000 people born in Somalia in Minnesota and roughly 94,000 Minnesotans speaking Somali at home, implying a much larger second generation.

• 2020 Census: The 2020 decennial census estimated around 91,000 Somalis in Minnesota.

• 2024 ACS (latest): The ACS now puts the population of Somali descent around 108,000, while local media summarizing Census Bureau data quote about 107,000 Somali Minnesotans and ~84,000 in the Twin Cities metro.

The Minnesota Reformer notes that even these latest numbers carry a margin of error on the order of 10,000–20,000 people, and that the exact total is “unknowable” in a precise sense. (MR)

A defensible working range is therefore:

Current Somali population in Minnesota: ~80,000–110,000, concentrated overwhelmingly in the Twin Cities and a handful of regional hubs.

The Enclave Pattern

Settlement is not evenly distributed across the state. It follows a classic enclave pattern:

• In Minneapolis, the Cedar–Riverside / Cedar Avenue South district—nicknamed “Little Mogadishu”—is home to one of the largest immigrant communities in the Twin Cities; Somalis are now the predominant minority group there, and Somali is the top non‑English language spoken in the neighborhood. (Wikipedia)

• Rural and regional centers like St. Cloud and Willmar host large Somali workforces in meat‑ and poultry‑processing plants and related industries, and increasingly in small business and services. (QZ)

This clustering reinforces Somali language, religious life, and social networks, allowing newly arrived families to operate in Somali for most daily transactions if they choose.

It also means demographic change shows up first and most sharply in specific neighborhoods, school districts, and labor markets, particularly in Minneapolis and a few outstate towns, before it shows up in statewide aggregates.

2.2 The “Magnet” Mechanism: Secondary Migration and Refugee Programs

A defining feature of Somali population growth in Minnesota is secondary migration—people who were first resettled in another U.S. state but then moved on to Minnesota.

According to the Minnesota demographer’s synthesis of administrative data, between 2010 and 2016 the state received 3,740 documented secondary Somali arrivals, mainly from New York and Texas, concentrating in Hennepin (Minneapolis), Stearns (St. Cloud), and Kandiyohi (Willmar) counties. (Wikipedia)

That count almost certainly understates the total, because not all moves are captured in formal notifications.

Why Minnesota, specifically?

• Refugee infrastructure: Since the 1990s, voluntary agencies (VOLAGs) like Lutheran Social Services and Catholic Charities have steered large numbers of Somali refugees to the Twin Cities, creating a critical mass of institutions, interpreters, and caseworkers.

• Job opportunities: Meatpacking, poultry processing, warehousing, and other entry‑level jobs in places like St. Cloud, Willmar, and Cold Spring have employed large Somali workforces—sometimes making up the majority of a plant’s workers.

• Reputation for generous social programs: The Minnesota demographer’s synthesis and local histories both note that the state’s relatively generous public assistance and health‑care programs became a “magnet” alongside jobs and established community.

On top of regular federal and state welfare programs, Minnesota participates in refugee‑specific assistance schemes:

• The federal Matching Grant (MG) program, administered by the Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), is an alternative to standard cash welfare. It aims to move refugees to economic self‑sufficiency within 180–240 days through intensive case management, job placement, and time‑limited cash and rent assistance, explicitly instead of long‑term public cash aid. (ACF)

• Minnesota also uses Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA) and related programs that align benefit levels with TANF and provide up to 8–12 months of support for refugees who are not eligible for other cash programs. (MN Health)

Put together, this creates a “magnet bundle”:

Existing Somali neighborhoods + job pipelines + comparatively generous safety net + targeted refugee services → a strong incentive for Somali refugees elsewhere in the U.S. to relocate to Minnesota once they have the legal freedom to move.

The popular phrase “welfare shopping” is an oversimplification, but it captures one dimension of a real behavioral pattern: refugees comparing different states and moving toward places where family, work, and benefits line up most favorably. In the Somali case, Minnesota has often been that place.

2.3 The “Replacement” Rate: Fertility + Youth Bulge

The key demographic difference is not how many Somalis live in Minnesota right now, but who is having children and how young those cohorts are.

Origin‑country fertility baseline

Somalia itself has one of the highest fertility rates in the world. World Bank and other demographic series put the total fertility rate (TFR) for Somali women in recent years at roughly 6.1–6.5 children per woman, far above the global average. (FRED)

Diaspora adjustment: still high, but lower

Once Somalis resettle in high‑income countries, fertility declines due to schooling, housing, labor‑market pressure, and access to contraception—but it remains well above host‑country norms:

• In Norway, for example, Somali women have a TFR of about 4.0–4.4, compared with 1.7–1.8 for Norwegian women overall. (PubMed)

Minnesota does not publish a clean, official TFR for “Somali women in Minnesota,” but:

• The Somali age pyramid is extremely young. Minnesota Compass data show that about 47% of Somali Minnesotans are under age 18, and Compass Points 2023 summarizes that “more than half of Somali residents are age 17 and younger.” (Minnesota Compass)

• The median age of Somali Minnesotans is about 19, the youngest of all the major cultural groups in the state, compared with a white median age of roughly 42. (Star Tribune)

Taken together with the Norway data and Minnesota’s own age profile, a reasonable working estimate is:

Somali TFR in Minnesota today: On the order of 3.5–4.0 children per woman,
compared with roughly 1.7–1.9 for Minnesota overall and even lower for White non‑Hispanic Minnesotans. (Wikipedia)

That implies Somali women in Minnesota likely have about 2x as many children, on average, as white women in the state.

What that means for births now

Somalis are only about 2% of Minnesota’s total population, but if they:

1. account for ~2% of the headcount, and

2. have roughly 2x the fertility of Whites,

then a very simple calculation suggests they are already responsible for something like 3–5% of all births statewide, and a much larger share of births within the Black population—on the order of one‑third or more, depending on how you classify mixed backgrounds.

The exact percentages will vary by year and county, but the structural pattern is robust:

1. The white population is older and below replacement;

2. The Somali population is younger and well above replacement;

3. Each year that persists, the Somali share of children and teenagers rises faster than their share of the total population.

This is what a “youth bulge” looks like in practice: an ethnic community that is disproportionately present in day‑care centers, public schools, and entry‑level labor markets, even if it still looks numerically small in the statewide totals.

2.4 Future Projections: The “Minneapolis Scenario”

Official projections from the Minnesota State Demographic Center do not break out Somalis specifically, but they do project the future of the broader racial categories under which most Somalis are counted.

From 2024 to 2075, the Demographic Center projects:

• The Black population will grow from 440,627 to 785,638 (nearly doubling).

• The Asian population will grow from 323,309 to 498,668.

• The White population will shrink from about 4.45 million to 3.98 million, even as the total state population inches up to around 6.1 million. (mn.gov)

Somalis are one part of this broader Black/African category. Combining recent Somali estimates (~107,000) with the statewide Black population (~440,000) implies Somalis currently make up on the order of ~20-25% of Black Minnesotans, depending on classification.

From there, you can construct scenarios:

• Baseline-share scenario: If Somalis remain at roughly 20% of Minnesota’s Black population, then with the Black total projected at ~785,000 in 2075, a future Somali population of around 150,000–160,000 is a reasonable baseline.

• Moderate-growth scenario: If, given their younger age structure and higher fertility, Somalis grew to 30% of Minnesota’s Black population by late‑century, that would imply ~235,000–240,000 Somali Minnesotans.

• Upper‑bound scenario: If they eventually accounted for about 40% of the Black population (a stretch, but arithmetically possible if fertility and migration gaps persist), the 2075 Somali headcount would sit around 310,000.

Given a projected total Minnesota population of about 6.1 million by 2075, those scenarios translate roughly into:

• Low: ~2.5% of MN

• Middle: ~3.5–4% of MN

• High: ~4.5–5% of MN

This would be with Somali‑origin people forming a larger share of the under‑30 population and of annual births than of the total headcount, because of their age pyramid.

A simple “replacement” thought experiment

To see the direction of change, consider a stripped‑down two‑group example (Somali vs. White):

• Start with Somalis at 2% of the population.

• Assume Somali women average 3.5 births, White women 1.6.

• Assume each “generation” is 25 years, and ignore migration and intermarriage.

If you compute the share of births each generation under those conditions, the Somali share of births rises to roughly:

• ~4–5% after one generation,

• ~9% after two,

• ~18% after three.

Actual Minnesota will be more complex—fertility typically converges downward for immigrant groups, and other BIPOC communities are growing as well—but the core logic is straightforward:

If one group is very young and has roughly 2x the fertility of an older, shrinking majority, that group will account for a disproportionately growing share of the state’s children, students, and new workers, even if it never becomes a numeric majority on its own.

In that sense, Minnesota is already living through an early phase of what you could call the “Minneapolis Scenario”: an aging white population, particularly outside the core cities, slowly ceding demographic ground to younger, immigrant‑heavy and BIPOC cohorts concentrated in the Twin Cities and a few key regional hubs.

Somalis are not the only driver of that change, but they are a visible and rapidly growing component of it—especially in the parts of the state where future economic and political power will be concentrated.

---

III. The Fiscal Ledger: Insolvency & The “Dutch Proxy”

Use your brain: Unless you gather data ultra-granularly like the Netherlands (they arguably didn’t go far enough but are the best we have globally), you cannot claim that you have strong data supporting the idea that Somalians and/or refugees and/or unselected immigrants of any kind become “net positive” contributors in the second-, third-, or subsequent generations.

Most progressive data cites “GDP” contributions of the median “immigrant” failing to control for: (1) type of immigrant; (2) ethnicity; (3) lifetime contributions; (4) subsequent generations; etc.

Jan van de Beek et al. (2024) published “The Long-Term Fiscal Impact of Immigrants in the Netherlands” and this is really the only research attempting to honestly dig into the data without pulling the wool over the eyes of the general public or deliberately obfuscating reality to maintain woke “right-think.”

This section does not look at “GDP,” “economic impact,” or feel‑good aggregates. It looks at fiscal arithmetic: what Somali Minnesotans, as a group, pay in taxes versus what governments spend on them, using Minnesota‑specific data and a Dutch‑style lifetime framework.

Where we have to estimate, the assumptions are stated explicitly. Where there are ranges, they reflect different plausible parameter choices, not hand‑waving.

3.1 Structural Poverty and Demographic Load

Minnesota Compass’ Somali profile (2019–2023 ACS) gives a clear picture of the community in Minnesota.

• Population: ~79,000 Somali Minnesotans.

• Age structure: 47.1% are under 18; only 3.8% are 65+. The state as a whole has about 23% under 18.

• Poverty:

  • Overall poverty rate: 36.4%.

  • Children under 18 in poverty: 42.6%.

  • Adults 65+ in poverty: 57.6%.

• Income & households:

  • Median Somali household income: $43,600 (2022 dollars).

  • 40.1% of Somali households earn < $35,000.

  • Average household size: 3.98.

• Housing:

  • 86.6% of Somali households are renters.

  • 57.8% of Somali renter households are cost‑burdened (spend ≥30% of income on housing); 53.6% of Somali households overall are cost‑burdened.

By contrast, Minnesota’s overall poverty rate in 2023 was 9.3%, with child poverty at about 10.1%.

So, relative to the state:

1. Somali poverty is roughly 4× higher than the statewide rate.

2. Somali child poverty is roughly 4× higher than the statewide child poverty rate.

3. Somali seniors (65+) are over half in poverty versus ~9.5% of Minnesota seniors overall.

This is not a transitional “just arrived” profile. This is a young but structurally poor population: low incomes, large families, a heavy child load, and very high dependence on rental housing.

For fiscal purposes, this means:

• Very low tax capacity per person (little taxable income per head).

• Very high eligibility for means‑tested programs (welfare, Medicaid, housing, etc.).

• Above‑average use of education spending, because nearly half the population is school‑aged.

3.2 Welfare Utilization and Housing Pressure

Minnesota is one of the most generous welfare states in the country. The Urban‑Brookings Tax Policy Center’s 2020 numbers show state + local public welfare spending of $3,157 per resident, out of $11,622 in total per‑capita direct general expenditures. (TPC)

• Total state + local per‑capita spending (MN, FY 2020): $11,622

  • Elementary & secondary education: $2,497

  • Higher education: $946

  • Public welfare: $3,157

  • Other (police, courts, roads, admin, etc.): $5,022 (by subtraction)

When you adjust welfare spending by the number of people in poverty, Minnesota emerges as an extreme outlier:

• The Center of the American Experiment calculates that in 2021 Minnesota spent about $36,400 on public welfare per person in poverty, and about $40,280 per poor person in 2022 (about $38,500 in 2021 dollars).

• That is second‑highest in the U.S., behind only Massachusetts.

Combine that generosity with Somali poverty:

• Somali poverty: 36.4% vs ~9–10% statewide.

If you simply scale Minnesota’s welfare outlays per poor person by the Somali poverty rate, you get a Somali‑specific welfare cost on the order of:

• Low estimate: use Census/TPC‑style per‑poor costs ≈ $34k → 0.364 × $34,000 ≈ $12,000 per Somali per year.

• High estimate: use Minnesota’s 2022 welfare per poor ≈ $40,280 → 0.364 × $40,280 ≈ $14,600 per Somali per year.

That’s just welfare and health‑related transfer programs captured in the “public welfare” category—before counting K–12 schooling, higher education, or general public services.

Given that more than half of Somali renter households are cost‑burdened and almost all are renters, a substantial share of those welfare dollars will be in the form of Medicaid, cash/food support, and housing‑related assistance.

3.3 The Fiscal Cost Model: A Minnesota “Dutch Proxy”

This is the core of the section: a Minnesota‑specific fiscal estimate built to be comparable in spirit to Jan van de Beek’s Dutch lifetime model for immigrants.

Tax side: what Somali Minnesotans pay

Economist Bruce Corrie’s widely cited estimates (KSTP) give:

• At least $500 million in annual income generated by Somali Minnesotans.

• $67 million per year in state and local taxes.

Using the Minnesota Compass population of ~79,000 Somalis, that implies:

• Income per person ≈ $6,300

• State + local tax per person ≈ $850

Assuming this $500m is mostly wages/self‑employment income subject to payroll tax, we can approximate:

• Payroll (FICA) taxes: 15.3% of $500m ≈ $76.5m, or ≈ $970 per person.

So under Corrie’s conservative income estimate, total taxes per Somali per year (payroll + state/local) are roughly:

$850 + $970 ≈ $1,800 per person per year.

This is a lower‑bound revenue estimate, because:

• It ignores any federal income tax paid (which is often small or negative at these income levels due to refundable credits).

• It assumes total income is only $500m. In reality, if you multiply the ACS median Somali household income ($43,600) by the ~20,900 Somali households, you get a higher aggregate income (~$910m), which would raise payroll tax toward $1,760 per person, and total taxes toward $2,600 per person per year.

So a plausible tax range for Somali Minnesotans is:

≈ $1,800–$2,600 per person per year (all government levels, mainly payroll + state/local).

Spending side: what Minnesota spends, adjusted for Somali demography

Starting from the Tax Policy Center’s state + local per‑capita spending for Minnesota:

• Total: $11,622 per person

  • K–12 education: $2,497

  • Higher education: $946

  • Public welfare: $3,157

  • Other (police, courts, roads, admin, etc.): $5,022

Now adjust for Somali demography and poverty:

1. Public welfare (means‑tested transfers)

   • Minnesota spends ≈ $36,400–$40,280 per person in poverty.

   • 36.4% of Somalis are below poverty.

   • So welfare per Somali resident is roughly:

     • Low: 0.364 × $34k–$36k ≈ $12,000–$13,000

     • High: 0.364 × $40,280 ≈ $14,600

   I’ll use a compact range: ≈ $12,400–$14,700 per Somali per year in public‑welfare spending.

2. K–12 education

   • Minnesota: about 23% of the population is under 18 in 2025.

   • K–12 spending per resident: $2,497.

   • That implies per‑pupil K–12 cost ≈ $2,497 / 0.23 ≈ $10,800 per student per year.

   • Among Somalis, 47.1% are under 18.

   • So per Somali resident, K–12 spending averages ≈ 0.471 × $10,800 ≈ $5,100 per year.

3. Higher education

   • Statewide higher‑ed spending per resident: $946.

   • Somali age structure is very young; use the statewide per‑capita higher‑ed figure as a reasonable ballpark: ≈ $950 per Somali per year.

4. Other public services (police, roads, courts, admin, etc.)

   • Residual “other” category: $5,022 per resident per year.

   • These are the “congestible” public goods: policing, infrastructure, general government, etc.

   • In this model, each Somali resident is assigned the full average per‑capita cost, not a discounted share.

Putting all of that together:

• Low‑spend scenario (lower welfare assumption):

  • Welfare ≈ $12,400

  • K–12 ≈ $5,100

  • Higher ed ≈ $950

  • Other ≈ $5,022
    → Total spending ≈ $23,400 per Somali per year

• High‑spend scenario (high welfare / 2022 generosity):

  • Welfare ≈ $14,700

  • K–12 ≈ $5,100

  • Higher ed ≈ $950

  • Other ≈ $5,022
    → Total spending ≈ $25,700 per Somali per year

So the Minnesota state + local spending footprint per Somali resident is:

≈ $23,000–$26,000 per person per year, before counting purely federal programs like Social Security and Medicare, and before counting any private charity or NGO support.

Net annual fiscal deficit per Somali Minnesotan

Combine the tax and spending ranges:

• Taxes per person: ≈ $1,800–$2,600

• Spending per person: ≈ $23,000–$26,000

That gives a net deficit per Somali Minnesotan of roughly:

≈ $21,000–$24,000 per person per year (state + local + payroll side of federal).

This is already conservative in the sense that:

• We treat net federal income tax as ≈ $0, effectively ignoring negative taxes (refundable EITC/Child Tax Credit) that refugees with children often receive.

• We do not add pure federal spending like Social Security and Medicare (which will grow as the cohort ages).

• We do not count any private charity (churches, food banks, refugee NGOs), which are real resource transfers but outside government budgets.

Those omissions bias the estimate toward a smaller net deficit. The true “total support from society” is therefore more negative than the fiscal estimate.

Lifetime net cost: applying a Dutch‑style framework

To compare with Dutch lifetime numbers, you convert that annual net deficit into a present value over the remaining life cycle.

Somali Minnesotans are extremely young (47.1% under 18, only 3.8% 65+), so assuming an average 50‑year remaining horizon is reasonable.

Using:

• A 3% real discount rate (more conservative than Dutch CPB’s effective ~1.5%),

• A constant annual net deficit of $21,000–$24,000,

…the standard discounted‑annuity factor over 50 years is about 25.7. That yields a lifetime net cost per Somali of roughly:

• Low end: $20,800 × 25.7 ≈ $540,000

• High end: $23,900 × 25.7 ≈ $610,000

So under these conservative assumptions:

Best good‑faith estimate of lifetime net fiscal cost per Somali Minnesotan (NPV, 3% discount, ≈50‑year horizon): ≈ $550,000–$600,000 per person.

For a representative large household of 8 people (2 adults + 6 children), that implies:

≈ $4.4–$4.8 million in lifetime net fiscal cost, if the observed income and program‑use patterns persist.

If instead you use the same low effective discount rate (~1.5%) the Dutch CPB uses in its long‑term budget projections, the annuity factor jumps to ≈35, and the per‑person NPV deficit moves into the $700,000–$850,000 range—very close to the worst‑case Dutch estimates for the Horn of Africa/Sudan region.

The “Dutch Proxy”: Horn of Africa & Sudan

Jan van de Beek et al., in The Long‑Term Fiscal Impact of Immigrants in the Netherlands, do exactly what U.S. data generally do not: they calculate lifetime, generational net fiscal contributions by motive (labour, family, asylum, etc.) and by up to 87 source regions, including “Horn of Africa and Sudan.”

In Table 4 (sensitivity analysis), they report for “Horn of Africa and Sudan” first‑generation immigrants:

• Baseline scenario: –€606,000 per person (NPV)

• With public goods partially weighted by GDP contribution: –€528,000

• With public goods 20% higher: –€665,000

• With pension age at 65: –€620,000

• With a 1 percentage point lower discount rate: –€849,000

These are net lifetime fiscal costs per person to the Dutch public sector, using very detailed microdata and CPB budget projections.

When you put that side‑by‑side with the Minnesota Somali estimate above:

• Minnesota Somali NPV (3% discount): ≈ –$550k to –$600k per person

• Dutch Horn of Africa & Sudan (baseline): ≈ –€600k per person, with a range –€528k to –€665k and down to –€849k under lower discounting.

In other words:

• Under conservative U.S. assumptions, the order of magnitude is similar: roughly half a million to two‑thirds of a million in net lifetime fiscal cost per person.

• If you impose Dutch‑style discounting and generous public‑goods allocation on the Minnesota numbers, the implied lifetime cost easily overlaps the Dutch Horn‑of‑Africa range and can reach $700k–$850k per person.

Because Minnesota’s welfare system is among the most generous per poor person in the U.S., and the Somali poverty and child load are so extreme, it is entirely plausible that the true long‑run fiscal cost per Somali Minnesotan is at least as large as, and possibly higher than, the Dutch per‑person cost for Horn‑of‑Africa asylum migrants.

What we cannot do honestly with current U.S. microdata is put a precise dollar figure on multi‑generation Somali Minnesotan deficits in the way van de Beek does for the Netherlands.

But the combination of:

• Minnesota’s per‑poor spending levels,

• Somali Minnesotans’ poverty and age profile, and

• Corrie’s own tax and income estimates

makes it mathematically impossible for the current Somali population in Minnesota to be anywhere near net‑positive fiscally as a group at this point in time.

3.4 Capital Flight: Remittances and the “Multiplier”

The fiscal ledger above is government‑only. It does not account for where disposable income (and welfare‑derived purchasing power) is ultimately spent.

For the Somali diaspora, one of the defining economic behaviors is remitting money abroad:

• Oxfam and related studies estimate that members of the Somali diaspora send around $1.3 billion per year to Somalia, comprising roughly 25–45% of Somalia’s economy. (Oxfam)

• About $215 million per year of those remittances come specifically from Somali‑Americans and Somalis in the United States. (BlackPressUSA)

• More recent World Bank–linked work suggests total remittances to Somalia in recent years are closer to $1.7 billion annually, underscoring how central they are to Somalia’s macroeconomy. (World Bank Blogs)

There are no precise numbers for “Somali remittances from Minnesota”, but given Minnesota’s status as the largest Somali community in the U.S., it is reasonable to infer that a disproportionate fraction of the $215m from Somali‑Americans originates there.

From the Minnesota perspective:

• Every dollar of wages, welfare, or subsidized income that is remitted abroad is a dollar not spent in Minnesota’s local economy.

• Standard “multiplier” logic (used by the same people who tout Somali GDP impact) works in reverse: money exported via remittances has zero local multiplier and instead stimulates consumption and asset prices in Nairobi, Mogadishu, Istanbul, etc.

On top of that:

• High‑profile welfare and food‑program fraud cases in Minnesota (some involving Somali‑linked networks, others not) have shown that large sums of taxpayer money have been misappropriated, with at least part of those funds plausibly ending up in remittance streams.

• Those losses are already reflected in the state’s welfare spending totals; to the extent they leak abroad, they are pure fiscal loss to Minnesota’s taxpayers.

Again, we lack clean Somali‑Minnesota‑specific remittance microdata.

But directionally:

• High remittance rates +

• High reliance on taxpayer‑funded income sources

imply that a non‑trivial share of the fiscal transfers documented above is effectively being exported, not recycled inside Minnesota’s economy.

What’s the takeaway here?

Putting all of this together, using only Somali‑specific Minnesota data plus Dutch‑style fiscal logic:

1. Somali Minnesotans are much poorer, much younger, and much more dependent on welfare and subsidized housing than the average Minnesotan.

2. Minnesota operates one of the most generous welfare systems in the United States on a per‑poor‑person basis.

3. Combining those facts yields a robust estimate that Somali Minnesotans impose an annual net fiscal cost on the order of $21,000–$24,000 per person, even under conservative assumptions that undercount total support.

4. Converted into lifetime net present value, that is ≈ $550,000–$600,000 per person at a 3% real discount rate, and ≈ $700,000–$850,000 per person at Dutch‑style discounting—the same ballpark as Jan van de Beek’s estimates for Horn‑of‑Africa asylum immigrants in the Netherlands.

5. None of this includes:

   • Private charity, churches, food banks, and NGO support;

   • Full federal outlays (Social Security, Medicare) over the life cycle;

   • The fact that a significant share of disposable income is remitted abroad and therefore does not circulate in the Minnesota economy.

Given these facts, it is not honest to assert that Somali Minnesotans, as a group, are anywhere close to being “net positive” fiscal contributors to Minnesota or the U.S. in the aggregate.

The best good‑faith reading of the available data is that they are, on current trajectories, a large and persistent net fiscal liability, of roughly the same order of magnitude as the Dutch Horn‑of‑Africa estimates—and potentially larger if one were to fully incorporate federal programs and private, non‑government transfers into the ledger.

---

IV. The Fraud Industrial Complex: Systemic Theft

Perhaps the most damaging revelation regarding the Somali diaspora’s impact on Minnesota is the prevalence of large-scale, organized financial fraud.

Federal and state investigators now agree that Minnesota has become the focal point of several unusually large fraud schemes targeting public assistance programs in food, housing, and healthcare.

Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph H. Thompson has described these cases as “massive fraud schemes” forming a “web” that has stolen billions of dollars in taxpayer money across multiple programs. (DOJ)

Key numbers from DOJ and state data:

1. Feeding Our Future (Federal Child Nutrition Program): Initially charged as a $250 million COVID‑era fraud with 47 defendants; subsequent indictments now total 78 defendants, making it the largest pandemic fraud case in the United States.

2. Autism/EIDBI program: State payments for autism services rose from about $1 million in 2017 to more than $220 million in 2024; DOJ and DHS officials say a large share of that increase is now believed to be fraudulent.

3. Housing Stabilization Services (HSS): A Medicaid housing support program projected to cost $2.6 million per year instead paid out roughly $302 million in 4½ years, with federal prosecutors saying “most” of this spending appears to be fraudulent.

FOX 9’s synthesis of DOJ figures puts likely losses from these three programs alone at about $822 million, and Thompson has said total fraud in Minnesota‑administered programs may ultimately exceed $1 billion once all investigations are complete. (FOX 9)

Most of the defendants charged in the largest schemes (Feeding Our Future and the first autism‑fraud case) are of Somali descent.

It is true that they represent a small fraction of Minnesota’s 70,000–80,000 Somali residents.

State officials and local leaders have repeatedly warned against blaming the broader Somali community for the actions of a limited number of individuals.

4.1 Feeding Our Future: Anatomy of the Largest COVID‑19 Fraud

Scale and structure

In September 2022, DOJ announced charges against 47 defendants tied to nonprofit Feeding Our Future and more than 200 affiliated food distribution “sites,” alleging a $250 million fraud on the federal child nutrition programs during the pandemic—“the largest pandemic relief fraud scheme charged to date.”

• By late 2025, 78 individuals had been charged in connection with Feeding Our Future, and at least 56 had been convicted, including founder Aimee Bock, described by prosecutors as the mastermind.

• The nonprofit’s federal reimbursements exploded from about $3.4 million in 2019 to nearly $200 million in 2021, a growth curve prosecutors and auditors describe as inherently implausible.

Mechanisms of the fraud

Charging documents and trial testimony describe a relatively simple but industrial‑scale mechanism:

1. Feeding Our Future and partner organizations applied to operate hundreds of “meal sites,” many located in small storefronts or offices with limited physical capacity.

2. Site operators submitted fake meal count sheets, fabricated attendance rosters, and falsified invoices, claiming to feed thousands of children per day.

3. In reality, many sites served few or no meals; some rosters reused or invented children’s names, including from school lists or other sources, according to charging documents and media summaries.

Specific examples from DOJ filings illustrate the scale:

• K’s Grocery, a small store in north Minneapolis, claimed to serve 1,000 children per day, seven days a week, despite having been previously disqualified from the SNAP program for suspected fraud. (DOJ)

• Defendant Abdirashid Bixi Dool allegedly operated fake food sites in Pelican Rapids and Moorhead and is accused of stealing more than $1 million through fictitious meal claims.

• At Evergreen Grocery and Deli, defendant Said Ereg and his wife Najmo Ahmed admitted submitting falsified meal count sheets as part of the scheme. (IRS)

Oversight failures

A 2023 report by Minnesota’s Office of the Legislative Auditor concluded that the state Department of Education “created opportunities for fraud” by failing to act promptly on warning signs, even after staff flagged Feeding Our Future’s claims as “not realistic.”

• When the state slowed approvals and raised questions, Feeding Our Future sued MDE, accusing it of racial and religious discrimination and claiming the agency was depriving children of food.

• Officials later told CBS News that fear of being accused of discrimination and the relaxing of federal rules during COVID significantly weakened oversight.

Laundering, luxury spending, and capital flight

Prosecutors say much of the Feeding Our Future money funded conspicuous consumption and overseas asset purchases:

• DOJ’s original indictments noted spending on luxury vehicles, houses, jewelry, and coastal resort property abroad.

• A Kenyan national, Ahmednaji Maalim Aftin Sheikh, was indicted for international money laundering, accused of helping his brother (a Feeding Our Future defendant) move millions of dollars in fraud proceeds to Kenya.

• In the autism/EIDBI case (section 4.2), prosecutors allege Asha Farhan Hassan sent hundreds of thousands of dollars abroad and used part of it to buy real estate in Kenya, funded by Medicaid and nutrition‑program fraud.

One defendant has already pleaded guilty to attempting to bribe a juror with $120,000 in cash left at the juror’s home, underscoring the scale and brazenness of the network. (CBS)

4.2 The “Mutation”: Autism, Housing, and Child‑Care Fraud

As scrutiny of Feeding Our Future intensified, federal prosecutors and state regulators began uncovering similar patterns of abuse in Medicaid‑funded services, especially autism therapy, housing support, and previously in child‑care subsidies.

Autism / EIDBI Program Fraud

Minnesota’s Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention (EIDBI) benefit for children with autism saw explosive growth:

• Number of autism providers increased roughly 700%, from 41 providers in 2018 to 328 in 2024.

• Payments to providers grew about 3,000%, from $6 million to nearly $192 million over the same period; total autism‑related claims rose from $1 million in 2017 to over $220 million in 2024.

State officials have opened about 85 investigations—roughly 20% of all autism providers—amid concerns about widespread upcoding, ghost billing, and unqualified staff. (KSTP)

Case study: Smart Therapy LLC (Asha Farhan Hassan)

In September 2025, DOJ charged Asha Farhan Hassan, 28, with wire fraud for an alleged $14 million scheme targeting the EIDBI autism benefit, while also charging her for a $465,000 role in the Feeding Our Future fraud. (DOJ)

According to DOJ’s detailed information:

• Hassan founded Smart Therapy LLC in 2019 and enrolled it as an EIDBI provider. On paper she was sole owner; in reality, other undisclosed owners included a person previously barred from operating an adult daycare due to misconduct.

• Smart Therapy allegedly employed unqualified “behavioral technicians”, often 18‑ or 19‑year‑old relatives with no autism training, while billing Medicaid as if licensed professionals had provided intensive one‑on‑one therapy.

• Hassan and partners “approached parents in the Somali community” to recruit children, working with clinicians to ensure virtually every recruited child qualified for autism services, regardless of actual need.

• As a recruitment tool, they allegedly paid monthly cash kickbacks to parents, ranging from $300 to $1,500 per child, with higher payments tied to higher authorized service hours. Parents sometimes threatened to move their children to other autism centers offering larger kickbacks, creating a de facto market in children’s Medicaid eligibility.

• Smart Therapy then billed Medicaid for maximum allowable hours, often for services not provided or only partially delivered, and used forged signatures or approvals from clinicians who did not in fact supervise the care.

• Prosecutors allege the scheme yielded more than $14 million in EIDBI reimbursements, with hundreds of thousands of dollars sent overseas, including to purchase real estate in Kenya.

This case is explicitly framed by DOJ as part of the same fraud “web” connecting Feeding Our Future, Housing Stabilization, and autism services.

Housing Stabilization Services (HSS) Fraud

Minnesota’s Housing Stabilization Services (HSS) program was created in 2020 as the first Medicaid‑funded program of its kind to help disabled and vulnerable individuals obtain and keep housing. (DOJ)

• The program was expected to cost about $2.6 million per year. Instead, it paid out $21 million in 2021, $42 million in 2022, $74 million in 2023, $104 million in 2024, and another $61 million in just the first half of 2025, for a total of about $302 million.

• DHS ultimately banned 115 providers from billing Medicaid due to “credible allegations of fraud” and announced on October 31, 2025, that the program would be terminated because of widespread abuse.

In September 2025, DOJ announced the first wave of federal charges: eight defendants accused of enrolling as HSS providers, acquiring the names of eligible clients from addiction treatment facilities and other sources, then submitting fake and inflated reimbursement claims for services never provided.

Acting U.S. Attorney Thompson called it a “massive fraud” and said he was “breathless” at the depth of schemes “stacked upon schemes” siphoning money from the program.

Child‑Care and CCAP Fraud

The pattern of exploiting trust‑based, high‑dollar programs predates COVID. Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program (CCAP) and related daycare subsidies have been under scrutiny for years.

Salama Child Care (Fozia Sheik Ali)

• In 2017, DOJ charged Fozia Sheik Ali, director of Salama Child Care Center in Minneapolis, with wire fraud and theft of public money for hundreds of thousands of dollars in fraudulent CCAP claims. (DOJ)

• According to the indictment, Salama routinely overstated attendance, at times claiming that more than 100 children were present and inflating daily counts by over 400%, including on days when the center was closed.

• The center’s license was eventually revoked after numerous safety and compliance violations. (Star Tribune)

Other daycare operators, such as the Deqo Family Centers group in St. Paul, have also been accused of billing millions for services not provided, prompting DHS to create a dedicated CCAP investigations unit and to close multiple centers. (Hiiraan)

A 2019 report by Minnesota’s Office of the Legislative Auditor concluded:

• There was no evidence to support a frequently cited claim of $100 million per year in CCAP fraud, though investigators believe the true level of fraud is higher than the $5–6 million proven in prosecutions to date.

• Allegations that CCAP fraud money was being sent overseas to terrorist groups could not be substantiated, though the report acknowledged federal concern that terrorist organizations in some countries (including Somalia) sometimes tax or exploit ordinary remittance flows.

4.3 Terrorism Allegations and Al‑Shabaab

Claims that Minnesota welfare fraud has directly funded Al‑Shabaab, the Somali‑based terrorist organization, have circulated since at least 2018 and intensified in late 2025.

Origins of the allegations

• A 2018 FOX 9 investigation reported large cash remittances leaving Minneapolis–St. Paul airport and quoted unnamed sources who feared that some money from daycare fraud “might be ending up in the hands of terrorists.” (FOX 9)

• In 2019, the Minnesota legislative auditor reviewed these claims and reported that it was “unable to substantiate” allegations that CCAP fraud money had been sent abroad and used by terrorist organizations, while not ruling out the possibility. (MN Auditor)

• In November 2025, a City Journal article: “Minnesota Welfare Fraud” — widely cited by conservative politicians — claimed that federal counterterrorism sources confirmed “millions of dollars in stolen funds” from Minnesota programs had ended up with Al‑Shabaab.

After the City Journal piece, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that the U.S. Treasury Department would investigate whether Minnesota welfare money reached Al‑Shabaab.

---

V. Sociocultural Incompatibility: The “Parallel Society”

Minnesota now has roughly 100,000+ people of Somali origin, the largest Somali community in the United States. Recent reporting and census‑based estimates put the figure in the ~80,000–108,000 range.

More than half of Somali residents are under 18 or young adults. Poverty is high: Minnesota Compass data indicate about 36% of Somali Minnesotans lived below the poverty line from 2019–2023—more than three times the U.S. rate.

Homeownership is extremely low: a recent analysis found only about 10–11% of Somali households own their own home, versus ~77% for white households.

At the same time, Somalia is a society organized around:

• Patrilineal clans and sub‑clans as the core social unit

• High fertility (total fertility rate around 6+ children per woman) (Travel.gov)

• Near‑universal FGM (∼99% of women 15–49 have undergone some form of female genital mutilation) (UNICEF)

• Legal and religious acceptance of polygyny (one man, multiple wives)

Those norms do not evaporate at the airport. They are colliding with one of the most generous welfare states in the U.S., a progressive school system, and a legal order that is explicitly secular and monogamous.

The result is not a literal “state within a state,” but a thick enclave: mosques, Somali‑run nonprofits, Somali‑majority charter schools, clan‑based business and social networks, and political representation that increasingly allow daily life to be conducted largely inside a Somali/Islamic framework.

In several key domains (FGM, polygamy, education, and security) this produces practices that directly conflict with Minnesota law and behavior that generates real external costs.

5.1 Female Genital Mutilation (FGM): High Baseline Risk, Low Visibility

Hard numbers:

• UNICEF and UN‑associated data put FGM prevalence in Somalia at about 99% of women aged 15–49. (UNICEF)

• A Population Reference Bureau analysis estimated 44,293 women and girls in Minnesota are living with FGM or at risk because they or their parents come from high‑prevalence countries—placing Minnesota among the top three U.S. states by FGM risk. (PRB)

• A 2023 AHA Foundation state‑level study estimated, for Minnesota:

  • 30,228 women and girls “likely living with FGM/C”

  • 5,478 girls “likely at risk”

  • An overall estimated FGM prevalence of 42.3% within the study population (women/girls with ties to FGM‑practicing countries). (AHA)

• A University of Minnesota continuing‑education program notes an estimated 37,417 girls and women in Minneapolis alone at risk of FGM. (CPT)

Law and enforcement:

• Federally, FGM is criminalized under 18 U.S.C. § 116, strengthened by the STOP FGM Act of 2020, which explicitly states there is no exception for religion or custom. (DOJ)

• Minnesota has its own felony statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.2245, making FGM a crime regardless of parental consent, and the Minnesota Department of Health runs targeted FGM/FGC outreach programs directed at affected communities. (MNH)

What this almost certainly means in practice:

1. Prevalence among first‑generation women is very high. If ∼99% of women in Somalia have undergone FGM, it is a safe assumption that the overwhelming majority of Somali‑born adult women in Minnesota are FGM survivors, whether or not they disclose it and regardless of where the cutting occurred (Somalia, refugee camps, etc.).

2. Tens of thousands of Minnesota residents live with the consequences. Combining PRB and AHA estimates, on the order of 30–45 thousand women and girls in Minnesota are either already cut or embedded in families where the practice is a live norm.

3. Enforcement is structurally weak. FGM is performed on minors, often in private homes or overseas (“vacation cutting”). Federal and Minnesota authorities themselves acknowledge that these factors make identification and prosecution extremely difficult. (USCIS)

4. Common‑sense extrapolation:

   • Given the legal pressure and community outreach, it is plausible that some families shift from Type III (infibulation) to less severe forms to reduce medical risk and legal exposure while preserving the perceived social/religious requirement. That pattern is documented in other Somali‑speaking regions under similar pressure.

   • It is also reasonable to assume some FGM continues secretly, either on U.S. soil or via short trips abroad, simply because cultural expectations do not collapse overnight and enforcement odds are low.

In other words: Minnesota has knowingly imported one of the world’s most extreme FGM‑prevalence profiles, concentrated in a single diaspora community, and the state is largely reliant on education and voluntary norm change rather than realistic detection/enforcement.

5.2 Polygyny, Informal Marriage, and Welfare Vulnerability

Baseline reality from Somalia:

• Somali law and Islamic custom allow a man up to four wives, and authoritative background reports (e.g. Landinfo’s Somalia marriage report) describe polygamous marriages as “quite common” among Somali men. (Landinfo)

• Recent clinical and survey work among Somali women finds roughly 20–28% of married women in studied samples are in polygynous unions. (PubMed)

What follows when this meets Minnesota law:

• U.S. and Minnesota law recognize only one spouse at a time and criminalize bigamy. Under Minn. Stat. § 609.355, entering into a second marriage while the first is undissolved is a felony (up to five years and $10,000). (Revisor’s Office)

• However, a religious‑only marriage (nikah performed in a mosque or at home, without a civil license) is not a legal marriage in Minnesota. It does not trigger bigamy statutes by itself.

The CDC’s Somali Refugee Health Profile, used by U.S. agencies, explicitly warns providers that “some Somalis may practice polygamy; men may have multiple wives.” (CDC)

That is an official acknowledgement that polygynous family structures exist in the diaspora.

Logical inference for Minnesota:

• In a Minnesota Somali population on the order of 80k–100k, if even 10–20% of married men replicate polygynous arrangements, that implies dozens to hundreds of households where:

  • One wife is on paper the legal spouse;

  • Additional wives are only religiously married, and therefore legally “single”;

  • Children may be distributed among these households in ways that fragment official records.

That is exactly the structural setup where welfare rules are easiest to game:

• A “religious wife” can truthfully or semi‑truthfully claim to be a single mother with no cohabiting legal spouse when applying for programs like cash assistance, SNAP, housing subsidies, or childcare help.

• The husband’s actual financial support can be understated or omitted, while the family still enjoys the effective income of a polygynous household.

We do not have precise Minnesota administrative data showing “X% of Somali households are polygamous and commit Y dollars of welfare fraud.”

But we know:

1. The cultural practice exists and is normative for a sizable minority of Somalis.

2. The legal structure (one recognized spouse + informal unions) creates a clear opportunity to misreport household composition.

3. Minnesota has already seen massive fraud in social‑services programs involving Somali‑run organizations—most notably the Feeding Our Future scandal and related schemes, with estimates around $300M–$1B in stolen or misused funds, and dozens of Somali‑descent defendants convicted or charged.

Putting those together, a cold reading is:

It would be surprising if there were not some level of systematic under‑reporting of income and household structure in Somali polygynous or quasi‑polygynous households.

The incentives are obvious; the enforcement risk is low; and large‑scale fraud has already appeared in adjacent domains.

We simply don’t know the exact magnitude, but the structural vulnerability is real.

5.3 Sharia‑Shaped Norms vs. Secular Education

The St. Louis Park Opt‑Out Fight

In 2023–2024, 6 Somali‑American Muslim families in St. Louis Park, a Minneapolis suburb, objected to elementary English lessons that used LGBTQ‑affirming storybooks and other “sexual content.” (Alpha News)

They argued that:

• The materials conflicted with their religious obligations;

• They had a right, under both the First Amendment and state law, to remove their children from these lessons.

The district initially denied opt‑out requests. After legal pressure from First Liberty Institute and True North Legal, St. Louis Park agreed in February 2024 to:

• Notify these families before their children are exposed to LGBTQ‑themed content;

• Allow them to opt out and receive alternative instruction. (First Liberty)

This was grounded in Minn. Stat. § 120B.20, the state’s parental curriculum review law, which requires all districts to have a process for parents to review materials and arrange “reasonable” alternative instruction if they object.

Interpretation:

• Somali Muslim parents did not ask to rewrite state standards; they used general parental‑rights tools to carve out a de facto religious exemption on sexuality/gender content for their children.

• The legal infrastructure they used is available to any parent; the difference is collective discipline and willingness to push, backed by religious obligation and coordinated legal support.

This is a template: when curriculum conflicts with Sharia‑based norms on sexuality, organized Somali parents can and do opt out of the mainstream in a way that reduces their children’s exposure to core parts of the public school’s social agenda.

Charter Flight and Soft Segregation

Minnesota has seen a surge of Somali‑focused charter schools:

• A recent study notes that “a little less than 12%” of charter schools in Minnesota are Somali‑majority (often 98–100% Somali), serving about 5,151 students. (Taylor & Francis)

• Earlier work already documented that “over ten” charter schools primarily serve Somali students, with parents seeing them as alternatives to mainstream public schools. (Digital Commons)

At the same time, research and community reports show:

• Somali families often complain that traditional public schools are not culturally or linguistically responsive, leading them to transfer to charters, move districts, or even leave the state or return to Somalia. (MinneTESOL)

Legally, charter schools must be nonsectarian.

In practice, when a school is:

• 95–100% Somali;

• Staffed largely by Somali adults;

• Informally structured around Ramadan schedules, halal food, and community expectations about modesty and gender interaction;

it functions as a taxpayer‑funded ethno‑religious space, even if official curriculum standards are secular.

From the host society’s perspective, the net effect is:

• Segregation: many Somali children spend their school days almost entirely with co‑ethnics and co‑religionists.

• Reduced contact with mainstream norms on gender, sexuality, and liberal individualism; more reinforcement of Somali/Islamic norms.

• Financial strain: when Somali families exit traditional districts for charters, those districts lose per‑pupil funding while still carrying many fixed costs.

Again, nothing here is illegal. But it is classic “parallel society” behavior: using the tools of a liberal system (school choice, religious freedom, parental rights) to build an institutional ecosystem that minimizes exposure to that same system’s dominant values.

5.4 Clan Structure, Crime, and Security Externalities

Somali society is organized around extended patrilineal clans and sub‑clans (Darod, Hawiye, Isaaq, etc.), which structure marriage, alliances, and conflict. These loyalties do not vanish in Minnesota; they are layered on top of U.S. racial and neighborhood patterns.

Documented security issues:

1. Jihadist recruitment from Minnesota’s Somali community.

   • From 2007–2008 onward, about twenty young Somali men left Minnesota to fight in Somalia; U.S. authorities concluded many had joined al‑Shabab, a designated terrorist organization. (MNHS)

   • Later, Minnesota became a disproportionate source of ISIS recruits relative to its population, prompting federal and state counter‑radicalization efforts. (ICT)

2. Street gangs with Somali identity.

   • The Somali Outlaws gang is documented as a Somali‑American street gang active in Cedar‑Riverside, around Karmel Mall, and in Saint Paul, involved in drugs, trafficking, and retaliatory shootings.

   • An NIJ‑funded report on “Transnational Crimes among Somali‑Americans” lists Somali Outlaws and other Somali‑named gangs as involved in drug and weapons trafficking, human trafficking, credit card fraud, and violent crime across U.S. cities. (OJP)

3. Large‑scale fraud with potential transnational links.

   • The massive Minnesota welfare/relief fraud scandals—particularly around Feeding Our Future and related programs—have produced dozens of Somali‑descent defendants and hundreds of millions of dollars in alleged or proven losses. (WSJ)

   • Federal officials are now openly investigating whether part of the stolen money was funneled to al‑Shabab in Somalia; as of now this is unproven, but the fact such an investigation exists shows how serious the concern has become. (Reuters)

How clan and enclave dynamics likely affect this:

• In any high‑crime neighborhood, there is a “no snitching” culture. In a Somali enclave, that sits on top of tight kinship and clan ties and deep mistrust of government born from war and authoritarian regimes.

• A clan‑based logic—“we do not hand our people to outsiders”—makes witness cooperation harder, especially when suspects are relatives or fellow clan members.

• Gangs often emerge from extended friendship and kin networks; in a Somali enclave, it is common sense to assume some alignment between sub‑clan networks and gang loyalties, even if official data rarely label them that way.

The point is not that “all Somalis are criminals.” Most are not. The point is that:

A small but non‑trivial minority of Somali Minnesotans have been involved in jihadist recruitment, serious street crime, and very large‑scale fraud, and their activities are reinforced by dense social networks that make them harder to detect, investigate, and deter.

That is a real security externality for the broader state.

5.5 Demography, Dependency, and Long‑Run Trajectory

Education and Human Capital

Multiple studies and reports highlight:

• Somali adults in Minnesota have much lower educational attainment than the state average; one analysis found about 37% of Somali adults (25–64) lacked a high‑school diploma, and only around 11% had a bachelor’s degree. (St. Cloud Times)

• A Somali student achievement report notes that Somali students in Minnesota consistently perform below white, native‑English peers on standardized tests and face significant language and cultural barriers. (MNEEP)

Combined with charter flight into Somali‑majority schools, this suggests:

• Slow upward mobility: It is unlikely that a community with low adult education, heavy concentration in low‑wage jobs (home health, meatpacking, etc.), and partly segregated schooling will rapidly converge to state averages in income and self‑sufficiency. (MN Chamber)

Demographic Momentum

Minnesota Compass notes that more than half of Somali residents are 17 or younger, a far younger age profile than the state as a whole.

Given:

• High fertility norms from the origin country;

• A youthful age structure;

• Continuing, if reduced, inflows of Somali immigrants and refugees;

you get demographic momentum: even without additional immigration, the Somali‑origin population will grow substantially over the next 10–20 years as the current child cohort ages into adulthood and has its own children.

If current patterns of enclave schooling, religious opt‑outs, heavy welfare use, and clan‑driven social networks persist, the logical long‑run picture is:

A large, internally coherent, economically stratified Somali‑Islamic subpopulation in Minnesota, with its own schools, businesses, media, political leaders, and informal law (clan/sharia norms) operating alongside (but often in tension with) the official secular, individual‑rights‑based system.

Taking the evidence and reasonable extrapolation together:

• FGM: Minnesota now hosts tens of thousands of women and girls from a nearly 99%‑FGM society. Law formally prohibits the practice, but enforcement is structurally weak, and some level of ongoing cutting (including overseas) is almost certain.

• Polygyny & welfare: Somali family norms include polygyny for a sizable minority; U.S. law recognizes only one spouse, creating clear opportunities to misreport household composition. In a context already marked by very large Somali‑linked fraud scandals, it is rational to assume some exploitation of this loophole.

• Education conflict: Somali Muslim parents in St. Louis Park have already used parental‑rights laws to carve out opt‑outs from LGBTQ‑affirming content, and Somali‑majority charters form a parallel, ethno‑religious school ecosystem that reduces assimilation into mainstream cultural norms.

• Clan & security: A small minority of Somali Minnesotans have been involved in jihadist recruitment, serious gang activity, and large‑scale fraud. Dense clan and kin networks make these threats harder to detect and police, raising genuine security and enforcement costs.

• Demography & dependency: High poverty, very low homeownership, poor educational outcomes, and a youth‑heavy age structure imply ongoing high usage of public benefits and a slow trajectory toward economic convergence.

You don’t have to be “woke” or “anti‑woke” to see the basic picture: Minnesota has not just imported individuals from Somalia; it has imported a dense social system with its own norms on gender, family, authority, and religion. In multiple domains, those norms clash with state law and liberal assumptions, and the size and cohesion of the community mean this is not a small or transient issue.

---

VI. Human Capital Deficit: The Anti-Assimilation Data (67 → 85 IQ)

The most significant predictor of a demographic group’s long-term economic success, fiscal contribution, and social integration is its human capital —specifically, educational attainment and cognitive proficiency.

While optimistic policy narratives suggest that second-generation immigrants will rapidly converge with native norms, the data on the Somali diaspora in Minnesota reveals persistent, structural deficits.

These gaps challenge the assumption that the Minnesota education system can simply “teach away” deep-seated disparities, pointing instead to a potential long-term drag on the state’s economic productivity.

6.1 K‑12 Achievement and School-System Load

Scale of English-learner demand

• Somali is now the third most common language in Minnesota schools after English and Spanish.

• A state language survey cited in the Somali Student Achievement in Minnesota report notes that about 88% of East African languages reported in schools are Somali, and Somali-speaking students have grown rapidly in districts like Minneapolis, St. Paul, and St. Cloud.

• English Learner (EL) enrollment in those three districts rose from roughly 9,200 to 12,500 in St. Paul, 7,500 to 8,000 in Minneapolis, and a few hundred to over 2,200 in St. Cloud between 1997 and 2016. Somali is a major component of that increase.

• Minneapolis Public Schools (MPS), the state’s largest district, is currently dealing with a projected $110 million budget gap for 2024–25.

Coverage by Minnesota Reformer and other outlets attributes the shortfall mainly to long‑term enrollment decline, rising personnel costs, and mandated expenditures such as special education and English-learner services.

The Somali share of EL students is sizable in Minneapolis but not separately costed in public budget documents.

Achievement patterns

Statewide Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment (MCA) results show:

• Overall proficiency (all students) in recent years has hovered around 50% in reading and less than 50% in math, with a downward trend since 2019.

• Proficiency rates for English Learners (ELs) and low‑income students are substantially lower than for non‑EL and non‑low‑income students, often by 20–30 percentage points, depending on grade and subject.

Somali students are mostly classified within the broader “Black” race category plus EL status, so statewide MCA tables do not routinely break them out as their own public subgroup.

The clearest disaggregated evidence comes from district‑level analyses:

• A 2014 Minneapolis Public Schools scorecard, reported in the Star Tribune, showed Somali students as one of the lowest-performing groups in math, with middle‑income Somali students meeting standards at about 11% in one year (down from ~51% the previous year).

• District officials later corrected part of that figure due to misclassification of lunch status but acknowledged a large drop and persistent underperformance relative to district averages.

Other reports (including the Somali Student Achievement study) consistently describe Somali students’ MCA performance as below both the statewide average and White, native‑English‑speaking peers, particularly in math and reading, though the exact gap size varies by year and grade.

6.2 Cognitive Proficiency (The “IQ” Proxy)

While direct psychometric IQ testing data on specific sub-populations is politically sensitive and rarely published by state agencies, standardized academic performance serves as a robust proxy for general cognitive proficiency.

A forensic analysis of the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) reveals a complex picture of partial convergence followed by a distinct plateau.

• The Proficiency Gap: Somali students consistently perform at the lower end of the achievement hierarchy. In recent MCA data, math proficiency rates for this demographic have been recorded as low as 22%, compared to 63-80% for White students. This gap persists despite significant state investment in English Language Learner (ELL) support and targeted interventions.

• Derived IQ Estimates: Utilizing the “d-value” statistical method—which measures the difference between group means in standard deviation units—researchers have derived cognitive estimates from this achievement data. The achievement gap frequently exceeds 1.0 to 1.3 standard deviations. On a standard bell curve (where the native Mean=100), this places the estimated mean cognitive proficiency of this specific population in the 80–85 range.

• The Flynn Effect: Gains and Limits: The data validates the “Flynn Effect”—the theory that moving from a deprived environment to an enriched one results in IQ gains—but also illustrates its limits.

  • The Environmental Gain: The baseline environment in Somalia, characterized by famine, lack of formal schooling, and endemic health issues, severely suppresses genotypic potential. The transplantation to Minnesota, with its access to nutrition, healthcare, and free public education, represents a massive “environmental upgrade”. The estimated performance level of 80–85 likely represents a significant gain over the baseline average in the Horn of Africa, confirming that the environmental boost has indeed occurred.

  • The Plateau: However, the expected full convergence with the native mean (100) has not materialized. The data indicates that despite the optimized U.S. environment, the group mean has plateaued significantly below the host population’s average. This suggests that the “environmental boost” has effectively peaked, and the remaining gap — roughly one standard deviation — may be innate, implying that further educational spending is unlikely to yield significant additional convergence.

Relevant: The latest National IQs in 2025 and National IQs are likely valid. Estimated IQ for Somalia is ~67.90. And no, this does not automatically mean the phenotypic presentation is the same as someone with ID (this is a common misnomer).

We should highlight several constraints:

• Minnesota’s public MCA data do not provide full score distributions by ethnicity + language + income (e.g., “Somali” as its own variable), so any precise SD estimate for Somali students specifically is inferred, not verified.

• The National “IQ-by-country” datasets that give Somalia a mean around 67–68 (e.g., Lynn/Becker and later updates) are heavily contested for methodological reasons.

Because of these issues, we can say with confidence that Somali students in Minnesota, as a group, perform well below White, native‑English peers on standardized achievement tests, but we cannot be certain of their precise IQ.

Many hereditarians believe a reasonable estimate for median/mean IQ of Somalis in MN is 80-85 after having gained ~20+ IQ points from the superior environment of Minnesota (relative to Somalia)… but hitting a genetic capacity peak in mean/median.

We should obviously hope this is incorrect but must remain open to the idea that evolved median/mean genetics have reached peak intellectual capacity in Minnesota.

6.3 Adult Educational Attainment

The educational gap visible in K‑12 data carries through into the adult population.

Minnesota Compass (2019–2023 ACS, pooled) shows for Somali Minnesotans age 25+:

• 40.6% have less than a high school diploma.

• 26.9% have a high school diploma or GED.

• 16.2% have some college or an associate’s degree.

• 12.9% hold a bachelor’s degree, and 3.4% a graduate or professional degree.

• Overall, 59.4% are high‑school graduates or higher; 16.3% have a bachelor’s or higher.

For Minnesota overall, the comparable figures (25+):

• 6.1% less than high school.

• 23.6% high school or GED.

• 31.5% some college/associate’s.

• 25.4% bachelor’s, 13.4% graduate or professional.

• 93.9% high‑school graduate or higher; 38.8% bachelor’s or higher.

So the share of adults without a high school credential is roughly 6–7 times higher among Somali Minnesotans than in the state as a whole, and the share with a bachelor’s or higher is about half the state average.

State labor‑market data show that, in Minnesota as a whole, employment and wages rise steeply with education. A Minnesota Office of Higher Education report found that only about 66% of adults without a high school diploma were employed, versus 90% of those with at least a bachelor’s degree, with large earnings differences across these groups.

Thus, the observed education distribution mechanically pushes a large share of Somali adults toward lower-paying segments of the labor market.

6.4 English Proficiency and Language Use

Language data for Minnesota’s Somali community (2019–2023 ACS, Minnesota Compass) show:

• Among Somali Minnesotans age 5+, 85.3% speak a language other than English at home.

• Only 14.7% report speaking English only.

• 36.6% are classified as speaking English “less than very well” (standard ACS “limited English proficiency” threshold).

For Minnesota’s overall population age 5+, by contrast:

• 12.1% speak a non‑English language at home.

• 4.5% are limited‑English‑proficient (“less than very well”).

In other words, Somali Minnesotans are roughly eight times as likely as the average Minnesotan to fall into the “limited English” category.

Combined with the very young age structure, that yields a large, continuing demand for EL instruction in schools and for interpretation/translation in courts, hospitals, and social‑service agencies.

Statewide budget documents do not break out a single dollar figure for “Somali-related language services,” but English-learner programming is a recognized and recurring cost center in districts with large East African populations.

6.5 Labor-Force Outcomes and Household Structure

Employment and unemployment

Using the same Minnesota Compass 2019–2023 ACS data:

• Among Somali Minnesotans age 18–64, 70.4% are employed (75.9% of men, 65.7% of women).

• Across all Minnesotans age 18–64, 80.3% are employed (82.5% of men, 78.0% of women).

So Somali working‑age adults have an employment rate roughly 10 percentage points below the state average, with a noticeable but not extreme gender gap (about 10 points between men and women).

Earlier, more detailed analysis by the Minnesota State Demographic Center (2010–2014 ACS microdata) found that Somali adults’ unemployment rates were about 2–3 times those of White Minnesotans, with roughly 19% of Somalis in the labor force counted as unemployed vs. about 6% of Whites.

That pattern applied as well to several other refugee-origin groups (Ethiopians, Liberians, etc.) and has likely moderated somewhat since the post‑recession years, but it illustrates how large the gap has been historically.

---

VII. Public Health Burdens: Resurrecting Eradicated Diseases

The question is not moral or sentimental; it’s straightforward: what risks and costs does a relatively small, tightly clustered, partly under‑assimilated group impose on everyone else?

CDC refugee health profiles and Minnesota screening data are clear that Somali migrants arrive with a distinctive bundle of health risks: high rates of latent and active tuberculosis, anemia, vitamin D deficiency, chronic infections, a very high prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C), elevated metabolic disease risk, and heavy trauma‑related mental health burden. (CDC)

On top of that, in Minnesota specifically, the community has developed unusually low MMR vaccination coverage and an extreme cluster of autism diagnoses. (Sahan Journal)

Taken together, this means that a population that’s ~2% of the state can account for 20–30% or more of certain high‑cost conditions (tuberculosis, measles outbreaks, intensive autism services) while also requiring substantial targeted public‑health infrastructure.

The community is extremely young: Minnesota Compass data show about 16% of Somali Minnesotans are under age 5 and more than half are under 25.

That age structure matters:

• It concentrates pediatric and reproductive health costs (vaccines, school‑based services, maternity care).

• It amplifies the impact of any pediatric disorder (measles, autism, rickets, etc.), because there are simply more kids per adult than in the general population.

This is the baseline: a small but young and dense group, mostly in a handful of zip codes. When they diverge from mainstream health behavior, it shows up very clearly in the state data.

7.1 Measles: A Self‑Inflicted Vulnerability

Collapse of MMR Coverage

Before 2004, MMR coverage among Minnesota‑born Somali 2‑year‑olds was above 90%, essentially indistinguishable from everyone else. (CDC)

Starting around 2008, anti‑vaccine activists specifically targeted Somali parents in Minneapolis with the claim that MMR causes autism. Over a decade, coverage fell off a cliff:

• 2004: ~92% of Somali 2‑year‑olds vaccinated with MMR. (EthnoMed)

• 2010: ~54% coverage. (PMC)

• 2014: ~42–45%.

• 2021: ~35% among Somali 2‑year‑olds, while statewide kindergarten coverage remained ~89%. (Sahan Journal)

So you effectively ended up with pockets where 50% or more of kids were unvaccinated, in a city where international travel to and from measles‑endemic countries (Somalia, Kenya, etc.) is common.

Outbreaks and Direct Costs

Since 2011, Minnesota has had repeated measles outbreaks, all heavily centered in the Somali community:

• 2011 – 21 cases, traced to an unvaccinated US‑born Somali child who caught measles in Kenya and seeded local transmission. (CDC)

• 2017 – 75–79 cases over five months, of which around 80–81% were Somali Minnesotan and 91% were unvaccinated; median age was 2. About 28–31% required hospitalization. (PubMed)

  • The outbreak response (contact tracing, exclusion orders, vaccine surge, hospital infection control) cost about $2.3 million in direct public‑sector spending. (PubMed)

• 2022 – 22 cases (the highest since 2017), mostly unvaccinated Somali children; 14 infected while traveling to Somalia, Kenya or Europe and then infecting relatives on return. (Sahan Journal)

• 2024 – 50–70 cases depending on cut‑off date; state and local reports agree the outbreak was driven mainly by unvaccinated children in Minneapolis’ Somali community, forcing the closure of at least one dugsi (Islamic school) and hospitalizing roughly a third of cases. (health.state.mn)

Crude extrapolation using the 2017 cost per case (~$2.3M / 79 ≈ $29,000 per measles case in public‑health response alone) suggests that the 2011, 2017, 2022 and 2024 clusters together have probably burned through at least $5 million in Minnesota state and local resources since 2011, not counting families’ lost wages, long‑term complications, or routine immunization campaigns. (PubMed)

Given that the outbreaks are overwhelmingly concentrated in a sub‑2% slice of the population, the per‑capita outbreak cost in the Somali community is several times higher than the state average. That is purely the consequence of:

1. Sustained refusal or fear of MMR in a specific enclave; and

2. Frequent travel to countries where measles still circulates. (CDC)

The rest of the state pays for the containment response and for the risk spillover into schools and hospitals.

7.2 Tuberculosis: A Persistent Imported Burden

If measles is the acute, headline‑grabbing issue, tuberculosis (TB) is the chronic, slow‑burn cost center. Measured coldly:

• From 1999–2003, Somali people were <1% of Minnesota’s population but about 30% of all TB cases in the state. (CDC)

• A detailed Minnesota study of ethnic Somalis 1993–2003 found 407 TB cases, with 59% extrapulmonary (outside the lungs), which is much harder and more expensive to diagnose and manage than standard pulmonary TB. (PMC)

• From 1999–2016, among 18,308 Somali refugees screened in Minnesota, 43% (7,850 people) were diagnosed with latent TB infection (LTBI) and put into long‑term follow‑up and/or prophylactic treatment. (CDC)

• A broader refugee cohort study (all nationalities) found 759 refugees in Minnesota diagnosed with active TB between 1993 and 2019, 54% within two years of arrival; Somalis were the largest single contributor. (PMC)

TB treatment in the U.S. costs on the order of $20,000 per drug‑susceptible case, with multidrug‑resistant TB costing upwards of $150–180,000 per patient. (Stateline)

The Rock and Urban data alone imply hundreds of Somali TB cases over three decades, very likely translating into at least $8–10+ million in direct treatment costs, plus millions more in contact investigations and LTBI treatment. (CDC)

On top of that, you have the long tail of 7,800+ Somalis with latent TB, many of whom will need periodic evaluation and some of whom will reactivate as they age or acquire comorbidities (diabetes, immunosuppression). That’s a permanent line item in county and state TB programs.

This isn’t “resurrecting” TB—TB was never eradicated—but it re‑concentrates it in a demographic that lives in crowded urban housing, uses public services heavily, and is young enough to keep transmitting for decades if control slips.

7.3 Autism and Neurodevelopment: An Extreme Cluster

The Somali community in Minnesota has attracted attention for 2 linked phenomena:

1. High concern about autism, which helped drive MMR refusal; and

2. Evidence that autism diagnoses really are unusually frequent in Somali kids now, even relative to other groups.

Early surveillance (Minneapolis, 2010) found that about 1 in 32 Somali children aged 7–9 had autism spectrum disorder (ASD), similar to White children (1 in 36) but higher than non‑Somali Black and Hispanic peers. Somali children with ASD were more likely to also have intellectual disability. (PubMed)

More recent Minnesota ADDM data and follow‑up studies are starker:

• For 4‑year‑olds in Minnesota (2022 data), overall ASD prevalence is 1 in 40, but Somali 4‑year‑olds are at about 1 in 18, roughly 3.5 times the rate in White 4‑year‑olds (1 in 64) and higher than other minority groups. (Addm)

• MPR reporting on the 2023 CDC survey summarized it as “1 in 16 Somali‑Minnesota 4‑year‑olds vs 1 in 53 of their classmates.” (MPR)

Take the demographics: under‑5 Somali children in Minnesota number roughly 12–13,000; that’s on the order of 2,500–3,000 children per single‑year age cohort.

At 1 in 16–18, that’s 150–180 Somali 4‑year‑olds with ASD in a single cohort, with similar numbers in adjacent ages. Over multiple birth cohorts you’re easily into the high hundreds of Somali children with autism in Minnesota.

Economically, mainstream estimates put the lifetime incremental societal cost per autism case (education, services, healthcare, lost productivity of the child and caregivers) somewhere between $1.4 million and $3.2 million in the United States. (Penn Today)

Even if you take a conservative number—say $1.5–2.0 million per child—multiplying by a few hundred Somali cases implies hundreds of millions of dollars in lifetime costs tied to ASD in this one community in Minnesota alone.

2 critical points:

1. There is no credible evidence that MMR causes this autism cluster. CDC, large epidemiologic studies, and vaccine injury data all fail to show any autism link for MMR. (CDC)

2. The more plausible explanations are messy and not fully understood: genetics, perinatal risk factors, vitamin D deficiency, early life adversity, and better case finding in a dense, heavily monitored urban group. Researchers themselves are explicit that the causes are uncertain. (PubMed)

From a budget perspective, though, the details of causation don’t matter much: the special‑ed system, Medicaid, and local clinics must carry the cost either way. Combined with low MMR uptake, the autism cluster has knock‑on effects: parents fear vaccines, outbreaks flare, and the state pays twice—once for ASD services, once for vaccine‑preventable disease control.

Note: Most rational thinkers believe that the sudden increase in “autism” diagnoses that aren’t fraud — are actually “intellectual disability” (ID). But since “autism” is a more socially-appealing diagnostic label, people prefer it (e.g. ASD is the new ID). Many are also highly skeptical that Somalis in MN legitimately have higher rates of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). It is likely that any researchers attempting to decipher why Somalis have higher rates of ASD will not find valid reasons.

7.4 Chronic Disease and Nutritional Pathologies

Diabetes, Obesity, and Cardiometabolic Risk

A Mayo‑linked retrospective chart review of Somali patients in Minnesota found significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, pre‑diabetes, and obesity in Somali adults compared with matched non‑Somali patients. After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, education, and employment, Somalis still had 2.8× the odds of diabetes and 1.6× the odds of pre‑diabetes. (PubMed)

More recent work confirms that among Somali, Iraqi, and Bhutanese refugees in the U.S., diabetes, hypertension and obesity are common and often more prevalent than in non‑refugee immigrant adults and the general population. (PMC)

Given the community’s youth, that translates into:

• High projected future demand for dialysis, cardiovascular care, limb‑saving surgery, etc., as obese/diabetic Somali adults age.

• Heavier use of public insurance programs (Medicaid/MinnesotaCare) to pay for this—since many Somali adults are low income or on public assistance. (Wikipedia)

It’s not unique to Somalis (poor, urban, non‑white populations generally have higher metabolic disease risk) but in Minnesota the Somali cluster is large, concentrated, and heavily dependent on state‑funded care, which amplifies the fiscal impact.

Vitamin D Deficiency and Rickets

Somali immigrants in northern climates are well‑documented to have very high rates of vitamin D deficiency, driven by dark skin, modest clothing, high latitude, and indoor living. (PMC)

Minnesota data:

• A population-based study of nutritional rickets in Minnesota found an increasing incidence after 2000, with several cases in Somali‑born children or newly arrived immigrants.

Vitamin D deficiency itself is cheap to fix (supplements), but late‑presenting rickets and bone pathology are not—they mean specialist visits, imaging, long‑term follow‑up, and sometimes surgery.

In the bigger picture, chronically low vitamin D interacts with obesity and diabetes to increase musculoskeletal and metabolic burdens on the system.

7.5 Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) and Reproductive Health

Somalia has the highest recorded prevalence of FGM/C globally, around 99% of women aged 15–49. (AP News)

Not surprisingly, FGM/C shows up in Somali‑origin populations abroad. The CDC Somali refugee health profile lists FGM/C as a priority condition for Somali women resettled in the U.S., including Minnesota. (CDC)

A Minnesota‑specific analysis by the AHA Foundation estimated that among women and girls with ancestral ties to FGM‑practicing countries in the state, around 42.3% are likely living with FGM/C, with tens of thousands at risk; Somalis are the dominant contributing group. (AHA)

Health‑system impact:

• Obstetrics: FGM/C increases risks of obstructed labor, perineal tearing, postpartum hemorrhage, and need for C‑section or deinfibulation in labor, all of which raise costs and complication rates in Minnesota maternity wards.

• Gynecology and mental health: Chronic pain, dyspareunia, urinary problems, and sexual dysfunction show up in specialty clinics and primary care; associated PTSD and depression feed into mental health services.

Again, none of this is Minnesota’s fault; it’s imported. But the state inherits a large cohort of women with permanent gynecologic injury who require more complex care than the average obstetric patient.

7.6 Trauma, Psychosis, and Mental Health Load

Multiple clinical and community studies in Minnesota and other U.S. sites find very high rates of PTSD, depression, and psychotic disorders among Somali refugees:

• A Minneapolis clinic sample of 600 Somali refugees found that young men (<30) had strikingly high rates of psychotic disorders, while women across age groups showed higher rates of depression and PTSD. War trauma, childhood malnutrition, head injury, and khat use were cited as partial explanations. (PubMed)

• A classic torture‑survivor study of Somali and Oromo refugees found high prevalence of torture exposure, strongly associated with PTSD and other health problems. (AJPH)

• Literature reviews on Somali refugee mental health consistently report elevated rates of PTSD, depression and generalized anxiety in Minnesota and similar host settings, driven by war, displacement, immigration stress, and stigma around mental illness. (Pubs)

From a systems perspective:

• You get heavy utilization of safety‑net mental health services, often via emergency departments, crisis teams, and county mental‑health case management.

• Cultural beliefs (jinn, shame, fear of labels) can delay presentation until crises are severe, making care more expensive and less predictable. (GW Psychiatry)

This isn’t “weird” in the sense of being inexplicable; it’s what you expect from a war‑torn, repeatedly displaced population. But Minnesota chooses to host a concentrated share of that global trauma, so the local psychiatric system absorbs disproportionately high refugee‑driven demand.

---

VIII. Crime & Public Safety: Gangs, Terror, Traffic

The importation of the Somali demographic has introduced new and volatile elements to Minnesota’s criminal landscape. Minneapolis and St. Cloud have witnessed the rise of ethnically based criminal enterprises that have evolved from loose associations of youth into hardened gangs engaging in interstate trafficking, lethal violence, and international terror support.

Minnesota does not publish criminal‑justice stats broken down by “Somali” as an ethnicity, which means any statewide “Somali crime rate” comparison would be guesswork. Even critics admit some of the viral claims (for example, “Somalis commit 80% of Twin Cities crime”) are simply false. (Minnesota Reformer)

So the only honest way to analyze this is:

• Stick to documented gangs, cases, and dollar amounts.

• Describe where and how the problems are concentrated.

• Estimate system costs using known per‑inmate costs and fraud totals, but not “Somalis vs non‑Somalis” crime rates the data can’t support.

8.1 The Evolution of Ethnic Gangs: From Street Cliques to RICO Targets

By the mid‑2000s, Minneapolis police and federal agencies were openly talking about distinct Somali‑identified gangs: Somali Hot Boyz, Somali Mafia, Madhibaan with Attitude (MWA), Somali Outlaws, 1627 Boys, and related offshoots. (CBS News)

A Minneapolis CBS report in 2009, citing local law enforcement, estimated 400‑500 Somali youth actively involved in gangs at that time.

If you put that against today’s Somali population (~107,000 statewide), that old number would translate to:

• Roughly 0.4–0.5% of all Somali Minnesotans, or

• About 1–2% of Somali youth if you assume ~30% of the community is under 25.

That’s a small fraction of the community, but concentrated enough in a few neighborhoods to produce a constant stream of shootings, retaliatory attacks, and associated drug and trafficking crimes.

Territory and violence

The best‑documented Somali‑identified gangs and their turf:

• Somali Outlaws – based around Cedar‑Riverside and Karmel Mall in Minneapolis, with presence in St. Paul and Nashville. Rivals include Hot Boyz, MWA, 1627 Boys.

• 1627 Boys – named after a high‑rise in Cedar‑Riverside; heavily involved in a feud with Somali Outlaws and associated crews.

• Somali Hot Boyz / Somali Mafia / MWA – mixed Somali youth gangs reported as active in Minneapolis since at least the late 2000s.

Court filings and local reporting tie these groups to:

• Retaliatory shootings between 1627 Boys, Somali Outlaws, and MWA, often with multiple shootings within hours of each other when a rival is hit. (State Court Report)

• Homicides and attempted murders, including a 2019 Cedar‑Riverside killing where two Somali Outlaws affiliates were sentenced for ambushing and killing a 17‑year‑old, paralyzing another victim, and fleeing the state. (Hennepin County Attorney)

Sex trafficking and interstate crime

The Somali Outlaws / Somali Mafia sex‑trafficking case is the clearest example of serious organized crime:

• Around 29–30 defendants, many of Somali descent, were indicted for moving underage Somali and African‑American girls from Minneapolis/St. Paul to Nashville and Columbus, OH for prostitution between 2000 and 2010. (DOJ)

• The operation involved grooming, gang rape, and selling minors across state lines, with gang status used to coerce and control victims.

This is not “petty crime”; DOJ used the full federal machinery for trafficking and conspiracy. It shows some of these groups are willing and able to run decade‑long, multi‑state criminal enterprises.

RICO‑level responses and “war‑zone” perception

More recent gang enforcement in Minneapolis has used RICO‑style conspiracy charges and federal gun prosecutions against clusters of Cedar‑Riverside and allied gangs (1627 Boys, affiliates like YSL, and connected crews). (Alpha News MN)

Local bail bondsmen and residents routinely describe parts of Cedar‑Riverside and surrounding complexes as “war zones” where gangs “take over” buildings and prey on vulnerable tenants. (Facebook)

At the county level, violent crime is heavily concentrated where Somali neighborhoods are:

• In 2024, Hennepin County (home to Minneapolis and “Little Mogadishu”) had a violent crime rate of 538 per 100,000 residents, roughly double the statewide rate (258.8 per 100,000). (American Experiment)

• Hennepin holds about 22% of Minnesota’s population but 46% of the violent crime.

That is not “Somalis = crime”, but it does mean the main Somali hubs sit inside the most violent county in the state and the gang activity is part of why.

Neighborhood‑level risk – Cedar‑Riverside

Cedar‑Riverside, widely called “Little Mogadishu”, is consistently an above‑average crime hot spot:

• Violent crime around 10.8 per 1,000 residents per year (≈ 1.1% per year, or 1 in 93 chance of being a violent crime victim). (CrimeGrade.org)

• Overall crime in Cedar‑Riverside is about 164% higher than the national average, with violent crime about 193% higher and an overall 1 in 18 chance per year of being victim of any reported crime. (AreaVibes)

Comparing that to the statewide violent crime rate (~259 per 100k), Cedar‑Riverside’s violent crime rate is roughly 4x the Minnesota average (back‑of‑envelope: 1077 vs 259 per 100k).

8.2 National Security: Al‑Shabaab, ISIS, and Lone‑Actor Attacks

The al‑Shabaab pipeline (mid‑2000s onward)

From about 2007, federal investigators documented a pipeline of young men leaving the Twin Cities for al‑Shabaab in Somalia:

• Congressional testimony and NIJ‑funded research refer to roughly 20 young men from Minneapolis–St. Paul traveling to Somalia for training and combat with al‑Shabaab between 2007–2010. (Congress.gov)

• One of these, Shirwa Ahmed, carried out a suicide truck bombing in Somalia in 2008 and is widely cited as the first known American suicide bomber. (OJP)

Case studies show overlap between gang life and later radicalization: at least one al‑Shabaab recruit had earlier been part of the Somali Hot Boyz gang before “going religious” and then violent. (Congress.gov)

The ISIS pivot

A National Institute of Justice study on “Transnational Crimes among Somali‑Americans” documents 16 known cases of Somalis who attempted or succeeded in joining ISIS between 2013–2015, including multiple men from Minneapolis arrested while trying to travel to Syria. (OJP)

Federal “Operation Rhino” and related prosecutions in Minnesota resulted in:

• Multiple material‑support convictions of Somali‑American men for ISIS plots and travel attempts.

• Long prison sentences and years‑long FBI undercover operations, informant work, and surveillance.

Per‑capita scale

If you combine:

• ~20 al‑Shabaab travelers and

• ~16 ISIS‑related Somali cases documented in NIJ and court records,

you get on the order of 35–40 individuals over ~15+ years from a community of ~100k–107k. (OJP)

Roughly:

• 0.03–0.04% of the Somali population, or

• About 30–40 foreign‑fighter / terror defendants per 100,000 Somali Minnesotans over a decade‑plus.

That’s extremely high visibility compared with communities that produced zero such cases, but still a microscopic share of the community itself.

Domestic “lone‑actor” attack – St. Cloud 2016

In September 2016, Dahir Ahmed Adan, a 22‑year‑old Somali‑American, stabbed 10 people at Crossroads Center mall in St. Cloud before being shot by an off‑duty officer. (Wikipedia)

Key points:

• Witnesses reported him referencing Allah and asking victims if they were Muslim.

• ISIS’s Amaq channel claimed he was a “soldier of the Islamic State,” but the FBI ultimately said they could not definitively pin down his motives beyond “possible inspiration” from radical Islamist propaganda.

From a public‑safety standpoint, this shows:

• Even a single radicalized individual can impose enormous cost in policing, emergency response, and ongoing federal monitoring and outreach in a city like St. Cloud.

Law‑enforcement and system cost (qualitative)

These terror and foreign‑fighter cases are some of the most expensive kinds of investigations:

• Years of FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force work, surveillance, informants, and undercover operations.

• Federal prosecutions with large legal teams and high security.

• Long prison terms in higher‑security facilities.

We don’t have a clean Minnesota‑only cost figure, but every such case is easily in the hundreds of thousands to low millions of dollars in investigation + prosecution + incarceration, even before counting the cost of outreach and prevention programs targeted specifically at Somali communities.

8.3 System Fraud & Welfare Schemes: From Child Nutrition to Autism Programs

A separate cluster of problems has nothing to do with street violence but still hits taxpayers hard: fraud involving Somali‑run or Somali‑linked organizations in child nutrition, child care, housing, and Medicaid‑funded services.

As detailed in Section IV, the Feeding Our Future scheme alone involved tens of millions in losses and dozens of defendants; for crime‑system purposes, what matters is the scale of organized fraud and the enforcement cost.

Federal and White House officials have claimed that “Somali fraud rings” have stolen over $1B from Medicaid and related programs, and CMS has threatened to withhold funds unless Minnesota tightens oversight.

Those billion‑dollar figures are political estimates; independent journalists and the Legislative Auditor stress that proven losses so far are in the low hundreds of millions at most, though additional cases are pending.

Direct fiscal impact

If you add up reasonably grounded numbers:

• Feeding Our Future: ~$128M in alleged fraud supported by evidence so far (out of $246M billed).

• CCAP prosecutions & confirmed daycare fraud: $5–6M.

• Charged Medicaid housing and autism cases: ~$24M.

That gets you to around $150–160M in plausibly documented public‑program losses, with the majority of defendants in those cases being of Somali descent.

If later investigations really substantiate numbers closer to $1B, that would equal roughly 3% of Minnesota’s annual general‑fund spending (about $37.6B in FY2024), i.e., not system‑breaking on its own but extremely large by fraud standards. (Urban Institute)

System costs beyond the stolen money

On top of the stolen funds themselves, every major fraud case generates:

• Federal and state investigative costs (FBI, HHS‑OIG, DHS investigators, auditors).

• Prosecution and defense costs (U.S. Attorney’s Office, public defenders, courts).

• Incarceration costs for those who get prison time.

Minnesota’s Department of Corrections puts its operating cost per inmate at about $134/day, or roughly $49,000 per prisoner per year. (mn.gov)

So, without even singling out Somalis:

• A fraud defendant who receives a 10‑year sentence costs taxpayers on the order of $500,000 in prison operating costs alone (49k × 10), plus benefits overhead.

• If a few dozen defendants from these Somali‑heavy cases ultimately get multi‑year sentences, long‑term incarceration costs plausibly land in the tens of millions of dollars, in addition to whatever was stolen.

That’s the right order of magnitude; we don’t have a clean list of exactly how many Somali‑linked fraud defendants will serve long prison terms, so anything more precise would turn into fiction.

8.4 Traffic Safety and Driver Licensing

Unlicensed driving and “Driver’s Licenses for All”

Immigrant communities in Minnesota, including Somalis, have long been over‑represented among unlicensed and uninsured drivers, simply because many were present without proof of lawful status or had trouble navigating the licensing system.

In October 2023, Minnesota’s “Driver’s Licenses for All” law took effect, allowing residents to get a regular (non‑Real ID) driver’s license regardless of immigration status. (ACLU)

The state’s own explanation of the law’s purpose is blunt: get everyone who is already driving into the testing and insurance system to make roads safer — not as a favor to any specific ethnic group. (MDPS)

Minnesota does not publish traffic citations or crash data disaggregated by “Somali,” so there is no honest way to say, “Somalis caused X% of hit‑and‑runs.” State privacy rules and data structure just don’t track that at scale. (PPI)

Evidence from other states on similar laws

Studies of “licenses for undocumented” laws in other states (by the same economists whose work Minnesota advocates cite) find:

• No significant change in the overall traffic‑fatality rate, but

• A 20–50% drop in hit‑and‑run fatalities, as unlicensed drivers no longer have the same incentive to flee.

In other words, once people are driving anyway:

• Licensing them doesn’t magically make them safe drivers, but

• It does reduce the share of crashes where the driver disappears, which reduces uncompensated medical and property costs.

Given that Minnesota has an estimated ~80,000 undocumented immigrants overall, it’s reasonable to infer that Somali immigrants are part of the group benefiting from this change—but not that the policy was written “for Somalis” alone. (COPAL)

8.5 St. Cloud as a Flashpoint

St. Cloud has been a small‑city pressure cooker around Somali migration, crime fears, and national politics.

The 2016 mall stabbing and backlash

After the 2016 Crossroads Center stabbing by Dahir Adan, national and local media descended, ISIS claimed credit, and St. Cloud became shorthand for “refugee violence” in some circles.

In the days after the attack:

• There were reports of pickup trucks and motorcyclists driving through Somali neighborhoods waving large Confederate and U.S. flags, which local Somali residents experienced as intimidation. (MPR News)

That combination — a lone Somali attacker plus visible counter‑protests with Confederate imagery — produced a lasting sense of polarization.

Ongoing political friction

Since then, St. Cloud has seen:

• Public protests over speeches criticizing Somali refugees. (CBS)

• White‑nationalist or “no more refugees” messaging (e.g., Identity Evropa banners and similar agitation). (St. Cloud Times)

• Somali residents mobilizing politically and civically — running for office, holding forums, and, in December 2025, organizing a “We are here” / UnitedAsOne event after Trump called Somali immigrants “garbage” and ICE raids targeted Somali neighborhoods. (St. Cloud Live)

The net result:

• Long‑time non‑Somali residents feel the city has changed too fast and associate that with crime incidents and federal terror cases.

• Somali residents feel collectively blamed for the acts of a small number of offenders and targeted by both political rhetoric and federal enforcement.

That’s exactly the sort of environment where any new high‑profile Somali‑linked crime or fraud case can act as a spark.

8.6 “No‑Go Zones”, Policing, and Areas of Weak State Control

There is no official recognition of “no‑go zones” in Minnesota, and police chiefs and county attorneys are explicit that they do not stay out of Somali neighborhoods.

They also push back on caricatures like “roving Somali gangs terrorizing people,” while admitting there is serious gang violence. (Star Tribune)

At the same time, several realities are hard to ignore in places like Cedar‑Riverside and parts of south Minneapolis:

• High violent‑crime rates (see 8.1) relative to the city and state.

• Gang turf and retaliation cycles that make residents and witnesses reluctant to cooperate (“no‑snitch” norm). (State Court Report)

• Documented difficulty for officers in investigating Somali gang shootings because of language barriers, clan politics, and fear of reprisals. (NHCC)

In practice, that creates zones of limited state authority:

• Police do go in, but much of the work is reactive (responding to shots fired) rather than proactive, intelligence‑driven gang disruption.

• Informal power structures — clan elders, gang leaders, landlords, mosque networks — often do more day‑to‑day conflict management than formal government.

Cedar‑Riverside is not a literal “no‑go zone”, but from a practical governance perspective it functions like an area where formal authority is contested and where gangs have more influence than they should.

Overview

If you want a cold, numbers‑driven summary of the Somali‑linked public‑safety burden in Minnesota, the data supports roughly this:

1. Gang & violent crime

   • On the order of hundreds of Somali‑identified gang members and associates over the past 15–20 years (not thousands), concentrated in a few neighborhoods.

   • Those neighborhoods (especially Cedar‑Riverside and Karmel Mall environs) have violent‑crime rates ~4x the statewide average and overall crime ~1.5–2x the national average.

2. National security / terror

   • Roughly 35–40 Somali Minnesotans over ~15+ years involved in al‑Shabaab or ISIS‑related foreign‑fighter or material‑support cases, plus one high‑profile St. Cloud stabbing with apparent extremist inspiration.

   • This is a tiny share of the community but enough to justify intense federal scrutiny and major spending on investigations and outreach.

3. Fraud and system abuse

   • Documented or strongly alleged losses in child‑nutrition, child‑care, housing, and autism‑therapy programs tied to Somali‑linked defendants are currently in the $150M+ range, with most fraud defendants in the biggest cases being Somali, but many non‑Somali co‑conspirators as well.

   • Politicians’ “$1B+” claims remain unproven in terms of documented cases, but they indicate the top end of what federal investigators fear they might eventually uncover.

4. Criminal‑justice system costs

   • Minnesota spends about $49,000/year per state inmate, meaning each decade‑long sentence costs roughly $0.5M in operating costs alone; dozens of Somali‑linked violent and fraud cases will translate into tens of millions of dollars in long‑term incarceration spending once sentences are fully imposed.

   • Investigation, prosecution, and defense costs (FBI, DHS, public defenders, county attorneys, courts) easily add tens of millions more over time, but those costs are not itemized by ethnicity, so any Somali‑specific number would be speculation.

5. Traffic & licensing

   • There are real issues with unlicensed immigrant drivers, but no credible breakdown that isolates “Somali accident rate” from everyone else. The Driver’s Licenses for All law is best understood as a harm‑reduction move: accepting that immigrants (Somali and otherwise) are driving anyway, and trying to push them into the tested/insured side of the system.

---

IX. Political Mobilization: Tribalism & Power

The Somali diaspora in Minnesota has turned a relatively small population (roughly 80–90,000 statewide, concentrated in Minneapolis–St. Paul) into an outsized political force. (Wikipedia)

That force is anchored in a dense, low‑turnover urban enclave (Cedar‑Riverside / Ward 6), is tightly interwoven with religious and clan networks, and is mostly embedded in the Democratic–Farmer–Labor (DFL) Party.

At the same time, the community sits at the intersection of three hard realities:

• Ethnic machine politics in Ward 6 and similar districts

• Real vulnerabilities in absentee voting and public‑aid patronage networks

• A rapidly destabilizing partisan alliance driven by Gaza, social conservatism, and external pressure from Trump‑era crackdowns

What follows is written on that basis: where there’s hard evidence, it’s stated directly; where there isn’t, the likely dynamics are inferred from the structure of incentives and available facts.

9.1 The “Ward 6 Machine”: Clan‑Inflected Bloc Politics

• Ward 6 covers Cedar‑Riverside and several adjacent, heavily renter and immigrant neighborhoods. City and media descriptions openly note it as home to the largest East African community in Minneapolis and the core of “Little Mogadishu.” (Wikipedia)

• Somali organizers successfully lobbied during the 2010s redistricting process to maximize East African voting strength in Ward 6.

Once that structure was in place, results followed:

• In 2013, Abdi Warsame won Ward 6 with 63.9% of first‑choice votes, defeating the incumbent in a landslide and becoming the first Somali‑American on the council. (Wikipedia)

• He held the seat again in 2017 after a recount, then left in 2020 to lead the Minneapolis Public Housing Authority.

• In the 2020 special election, Jamal Osman won a crowded field with a plurality and then consolidated the seat.

• In 2025, Osman took 4,164 of 7,797 ballots (~53–59% depending on RCV round), beating another Somali DFL challenger, Mohamoud Hassan, in every precinct. (Minneapolis Elections)

Empirically, Ward 6 functions as a safe “Somali‑aligned” seat: once a candidate wins the internal contest, they are overwhelmingly favored in the general.

Elders, brokers, and how the machine actually runs

The mechanics are classic ethnic machine politics with a Somali overlay:

• Somali society is historically clan‑organized; clan membership shapes social trust and politics in Somalia and continues to matter in the diaspora, though research finds its importance attenuated and episodic in the U.S.

• Within Minneapolis, Somali candidates rely heavily on mosques, elders, and community “brokers”—business owners, media figures, and nonprofit heads—who can mobilize large numbers of voters quickly. This is how both Warsame’s 2013 breakthrough and Osman’s later wins were described by local and ethnic media: mobilized tenant associations, mosque networks, and Somali‑language outreach, not just yard signs.

There have been concrete signs of hardball, identity‑coded campaigning:

• In 2013, Warsame supporters were accused of using Robert Lilligren’s sexual orientation and language barriers as wedge points in Somali‑language outreach; Warsame denied directing that, but the accusations themselves show how identity‑based messaging is deployed.

Given:

• language barriers,

• high trust in elders and imams, and

• dense, socially dependent public‑housing towers,

the most realistic model is this:

A relatively small set of elders and brokers decide slates; their endorsements are transmitted through mosques, WhatsApp, community radio, and in‑person visits. For many low‑information voters, especially elders, those cues matter more than candidate websites or policy white papers.

Clan fault lines and “spoiler” behavior

There is no question that clan identity remains real in Minneapolis. The open question is how central it is to electoral behavior.

NIJ‑supported research notes that tribal and clan membership still shapes Somali politics and that occasional conflicts in U.S. Somali communities erupt along clan lines, but stresses that migration has weakened clan as the primary organizing principle. (OJP)

9.2 “Ballot Harvesting” & Patronage Networks

Minnesota’s system creates both opportunity and vulnerability:

• The state allows early and absentee voting for any eligible voter; as of June 2024, voters can opt into permanent absentee status, getting ballots automatically. (Hennepin)

• Historically, Minnesota law limited one person to returning at most 3 ballots as an agent. In 2020, a court order temporarily suspended that cap, making mass collection legal that cycle, even as paying for votes remained a felony. (Star Tribune)

Overlay onto that:

• large numbers of elderly, limited‑English voters living in dense towers, and

• heavy reliance on trusted intermediaries to navigate government paperwork.

Structurally, that is almost an ideal environment for both legitimate assistance and potential abuse.

The Project Veritas episode: what was actually proven

The 2020 Project Veritas (PV) video made three big claims:

1. Somali‑linked “ballot harvesters” were seen with stacks of absentee ballots in their cars;

2. ballots were allegedly collected from elderly residents in exchange for cash;

3. this was supposedly part of a machine tied to Ilhan Omar and Jamal Osman. (Sahan Journal)

Subsequent facts:

• Local reporting (Sahan Journal, Minnesota Reformer, FOX9) showed the video was heavily edited, and the key subject, Liban Osman, later stated he was offered $10,000 by self‑described whistleblower Omar Jamal to falsely say he was paid for ballots.

• Because of the 2020 court order, simply possessing many ballots was not illegal that year; the legal line is forging ballots or paying for votes, which PV did not substantiate with verifiable documentation.

• The only federal criminal case flowing from that broader investigation is Muse Mohamud Mohamed, Fateh’s brother‑in‑law and campaign volunteer, convicted of perjury for lying to a grand jury about handling three absentee ballots—not for committing voter fraud itself.

Statewide, Minnesota has logged a small but non‑zero set of voter‑fraud cases (123 charges over four years, most commonly “ineligible voter knowingly votes”), and at least one high‑profile case involved a non‑Somali Trump supporter submitting a ballot for a deceased relative. (AP News)

So as of now:

• There is no judicial finding of a large‑scale Somali‑run cash‑for‑votes machine in Minneapolis.

• There is one proven perjury case in a Somali political network, plenty of smoke, and a set of structural vulnerabilities that any hard‑headed analyst has to take seriously.

That is the “machine” in practical terms: not just votes, but contracts, jobs, and donations, all moving inside a relatively closed network.

9.3 Fracturing the Coalition: A Transactional, Conditional Alliance

For roughly a decade, the Somali community in Minneapolis–St. Paul behaved as a near‑automatic Democratic bloc:

• A Somali American Caucus was formed inside the DFL; Somali leaders like Warsame, Omar, Fateh and others rose through DFL structures.

• In 2020, Biden reportedly won around 90% of the vote in Cedar‑Riverside precincts.

By 2024, that pattern snapped:

• Kamala Harris still carried Somali‑heavy precincts, but her support in Cedar‑Riverside dropped about 14 percentage points relative to Biden 2020.

• Statewide reporting confirms that Somali and Muslim voters shifted away from Democrats, with some moving to Trump and many to third‑party or protest abstentions. Top stated reasons: Israel–Gaza policy, the economy, and feeling ignored by the party.

At the same time, Somali and broader Muslim communities were increasingly vocal about social conservatism, especially around gender and sexuality curricula in schools and broader LGBTQ issues—openly at odds with mainstream Democratic positions. (MPR News)

Net effect: The Somali–DFL relationship is no longer “automatic”; it’s a bargaining relationship.

St. Cloud and the emergence of open bargaining

Outside Minneapolis, you see the same logic play out more explicitly:

• In St. Cloud, Somali candidates have run for local and state seats, often on bread‑and‑butter issues like affordable housing and health care, but have struggled to win general elections.

• At a 2025 public forum, Somali candidates like Abdi Daisane and Omar Podi complained that:

  • local DFL structures pigeonhole them as “Somali candidates,”

  • media coverage often racializes their campaigns, and

  • the party assumes Somali votes without doing the work. (St. Cloud Live)

Several Somali speakers have openly floated the idea that a Somali Republican could be viable if the GOP moderated its rhetoric on immigrants and Muslims — explicitly framing the community’s allegiance as conditional, not ideological.

Minneapolis 2025: internal split, external leverage

The 2025 Minneapolis mayoral race crystallized the internal fracture:

Omar Fateh, a Somali‑American democratic socialist state senator, won the DFL endorsement, running on rent control, a $20 minimum wage, and alternative public safety. (The Guardian)

Jacob Frey, the incumbent, ran as a centrist focused on traditional policing plus incremental reforms. (Star Tribune)

The Somali community split:

1. Fateh drew strong support from younger, more ideological progressives and parts of the renter base.

2. A bloc of about 15 prominent Somali leaders endorsed Frey, citing public safety, homelessness, and concrete promises: more Somali police officers, more Somali representation in city administration, and a new Somali‑oriented mall.

Inside Somali-language media and social channels, that split was constantly reframed as a clan fight rather than just an ideological one.

Somali YouTube channels, TikTok clips, WhatsApp audios and X threads cast Fateh as aligned with specific Darod sub-clans, while accusing some Hawiye elders of quietly steering their people to Frey to block a rival clan’s champion.

One widely shared explanation from a Somali commenter on r/Minneapolis described this as the aftermath of a “broken machine”: an earlier informal alliance between Darod-linked figures around Ilhan Omar and Hawiye-linked networks around her then-husband Ahmed Hirsi, which had shattered after their divorce and renewed clan tensions over places like Galkayo.

In that telling, elders were not just choosing on policy grounds; they were settling scores and making sure a rival clan network did not consolidate too much power in City Hall.

Outlets such as Pirate Wires and the Daily Wire seized on this discourse and framed the race as “ancient tribal blood feuds” deciding a U.S. mayoral election.

Frey ultimately won re‑election in the RCV count, but Fateh still captured a large minority of the vote, confirming that:

• Somali‑American voters are not monolithic even within DFL primaries;

• Somali elites can credibly deliver chunks of the vote to either side of an intra‑party fight in exchange for policy concessions.

This is textbook transactional politics: the community is not abandoning the DFL wholesale, but it is clearly willing to withhold, split, or redirect support when core interests clash with party orthodoxy.

Trump, fraud politics, and the likely trajectory

Layered on top of all this is the national environment:

• The Feeding Our Future scandal, with a majority of its dozens of defendants drawn from Minnesota’s Somali‑American community, has become a centerpiece of national conservative rhetoric about welfare fraud and immigration.

• Trump has recently escalated to calling Somali immigrants “garbage,” accusing them of “destroying” Minnesota, and pushing for mass deportations and the end of Temporary Protected Status, even as ICE raids have targeted Somali neighborhoods. (CBS)

Cold‑blooded inference:

• Some Somali voters — especially socially conservative men frustrated with DFL positions on Gaza and gender — experimented with Trump or the GOP in 2024.

• Trump’s subsequent anti‑Somali tirades and ICE raids make a durable Somali — GOP realignment much less likely in the short term; they effectively re‑ethnicize the conflict, pushing many back toward Democrats or third‑party protest, even if trust in the DFL is badly eroded.

The most realistic medium‑term picture is:

The Somali bloc behaves as a hard‑nosed, interest‑driven ethnic‑religious constituency:

• highly cohesive against immigration crackdowns that target Somalis, and intensely mobilized around Gaza, Islamophobia, and control over schools and religious life;

• broadly aligned with Democrats on welfare-state protection and anti-discrimination policy, while often socially conservative on family, gender, and school-curriculum issues;

• increasingly willing to punish Democrats (uncommitted votes, third-party, or a minority shift to Trump) when those red lines are crossed;

• but still deeply wary of Republicans overall, given years of hostile national rhetoric and enforcement aimed at Somalis and Muslims, which keeps most Somali voters anchored in or near the Democratic column.

In that sense, “tribalism and power” is not just a metaphor: the community has built a modern American machine that fuses imported clan and patronage logics with U.S. ethnic bloc politics.

The alliance with the DFL is instrumental, not sentimental, and is already being renegotiated under pressure from fraud scandals, foreign‑policy grievances, and an aggressive federal crackdown.

---

Final Overview: Somalians in Minnesota & U.S.

Many have noticed the official Minnesota “state flag” since 2024 has an eerie resemblance to the official flag of Somalia. Bizarre coincidence?

After three decades of resettlement, the data allows for a cumulative assessment of the Somali diaspora’s impact on the State of Minnesota and the United States.

When viewing the demographic not as a collection of individuals but as a 30-year economic and social entity, the “Final Ledger” reveals a profound market failure.

The experiment has failed to produce the predicted assimilation or economic benefit; instead, it has imported systemic fraud, violent crime, and a deep, structural fiscal liability that is projected to compound with each subsequent generation.

Pulling the report together, the picture that emerges is not about individuals but about systems and aggregates.

On current trajectories of fertility, age structure, educational outcomes, welfare use, and political behavior, it is possible to sketch what Minnesota may look like over the next half‑century if there is no major policy or behavioral correction.

The core features are already visible:

• A young, fast‑growing Somali‑origin population, heavily concentrated in a few urban and regional hubs.

• Persistent socio‑economic gaps in education, income, and homeownership.

• A high‑needs, high‑cost profile inside one of the most generous welfare states in the country.

• A politically organized, disciplined constituency that can act as a swing bloc within the dominant party in Minnesota’s urban centers.

The “Minneapolis Scenario” is not a prediction that Somalis become a numerical majority in Minnesota; they do not need to.

It is a scenario in which a small but cohesive, high‑dependency group exerts growing leverage over policy and spending in the parts of the state that matter most economically, while the broader tax base ages, shrinks, and fragments.

Political Capture and Institutional Shift

As documented in Section IX, Somali Minnesotans have already converted a relatively small population into:

• A safe ethnic seat on the Minneapolis City Council (Ward 6).

• A visible presence in the state legislature and city politics.

• A recognized intra‑DFL faction with the ability to swing endorsements and close primaries.

Demographically, Somalis will almost certainly remain a minority within a minority at the state level (one part of the broader Black/African category and a few percent of Minnesota’s total population). That is not enough to “take over” the legislature on raw headcount.

What it does support is something more subtle and, in practice, more important:

• Durable control or heavy influence in specific wards and districts.

• The ability to act as a disciplined bloc inside DFL endorsement conventions and primaries.

• A credible king‑maker role in intra‑party contests (e.g., Frey vs. Fateh), where a few thousand mobilized votes can decide outcomes.

In other words: not demographic conquest, but positional power — control of a few key nodes in a system that already leans heavily Democratic.

Once that position is secured, the incentive structure is straightforward:

• Use political leverage to channel contracts, grants, and jobs toward community‑run entities (non‑profits, clinics, schools, housing providers).

• Push for accommodations that align public systems with community norms— for example:

  • Sharia‑compliant finance mechanisms integrated into public housing and development programs;

  • Expanded religious and cultural exemptions in schooling (opt‑outs, parallel charters, etc.);

  • Targeted “equity” initiatives that, in practice, function as ethnic patronage.

None of this requires formal “dual law.” It proceeds via administrative adjustment and program design, where the formal legal standard remains nominally uniform but the practical implementation diverges for particular communities.

If current trends continue, the likely endpoint is a thick ecosystem of Somali‑focused institutions that are:

• Funded largely by state and federal transfers;

• Staffed and controlled by community insiders;

• Politically defended as essential for “equity,” “cultural responsiveness,” and “public safety.”

Persistent Stratification: The “Permanent Underclass” Risk

The most important long‑run variable is human capital. Section VI showed:

• Large, persistent gaps in K‑12 achievement, especially in math and reading.

• Very low adult educational attainment relative to the Minnesota average.

• Heavy reliance on English‑learner services, with a sizable share of adults speaking English less than “very well.”

These are not small, transitional differences. They point toward a structural skills deficit that, in a high‑productivity, knowledge‑heavy economy, is extremely difficult to overcome.

On that base, two broad trajectories are possible:

1. Convergence scenario (requires active change):

   • Aggressive improvements in language acquisition and adult education.

   • Substantial gains in high‑school completion, college attendance, and vocational credentials.

   • A steady rise in Somali college completion, skilled employment, and homeownership.

   • A gradual shift from net fiscal cost toward rough parity over multiple generations.

2. Stratification scenario (continuation of current trends):

   • Achievement gaps do not materially close, even into the second generation.

   • A large share of Somali Minnesotans remain in low‑wage, low‑skill sectors, with high welfare usage and low savings.

   • The community becomes a stable, numerically significant underclass: present in large numbers in schools, clinics, and housing programs, but under‑represented among high‑earning taxpayers and asset‑owners.

The “Minneapolis Scenario” assumes the second path: no radical educational breakthrough, continued enclave schooling, and ongoing tension between community norms and mainstream education. Under those conditions, Somali Minnesotans remain disproportionately dependent on state transfers, and the state effectively locks in an ethnicized poverty caste.

Fraud Evolution and the “High‑Trust” Vulnerability

Section IV documented a series of high‑profile fraud scandals (Feeding Our Future, autism/EIDBI, Housing Stabilization Services, child‑care subsidies) where:

• Structural vulnerabilities in “high‑trust” programs (loose front‑end verification, complex billing rules, heavy reliance on provider honesty)

• Interacted with dense, high‑trust community networks and entrepreneurial actors

• To produce hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.

Crucially:

• These cases are not about ordinary benefit recipients; they are provider‑driven frauds operating at industrial scale.

• The same general program design has produced fraud in other communities as well; this is not a uniquely Somali pathology.

• But Minnesota’s Somali‑run service ecosystem has clearly been over‑represented among the largest scandals to date.

The combination of:

• Language and information asymmetries;

• Tight social networks and clan ties;

• Political and bureaucratic fear of being accused of racism or Islamophobia when raising red flags,

creates a system where bad actors can operate longer and at larger scale than they otherwise would.

Looking forward, the likely pattern is displacement, not disappearance:

• Programs that have already blown up (child nutrition, autism, HSS) are gradually hardened—more audits, pre‑payment reviews, terminations.

• Fraud attempts shift to adjacent, less‑scrutinized sectors:

  • Personal care attendants (PCA) and home‑care services;

  • Mental‑health and substance‑use treatment;

  • New housing and “wraparound” services for vulnerable populations.

Unless Minnesota shifts from a default high‑trust, low‑verification model to a verification‑first approach across all high‑risk programs, the rational expectation is recurring, large‑scale loss events centered in the same provider ecosystem, even if the specific programs change.

The Fiscal Squeeze: Demographic Scissors and Net Liability

Section III used Minnesota‑specific spending and tax data to sketch a Dutch‑style fiscal model. Even under conservative assumptions, the group‑level picture was clear:

• Somali Minnesotans currently generate much less tax revenue per person than the state average.

• They draw much more in public spending per person, driven by:

  • High poverty rates and large family sizes;

  • Very high usage of education, health, and welfare programs;

  • Concentration in rental housing and low‑income neighborhoods.

At the same time, Minnesota’s own demographic projections show:

• A shrinking White working‑age population in absolute terms;

• Growth in non‑White and immigrant‑origin youth cohorts, including Somalis;

• An aging population that sharply increases health‑care and pension costs.

Taken together, this creates a classic demographic scissors:

• The share of residents who are net consumers of public spending (children, elderly, high‑poverty groups) rises;

• The share of residents who are historically net contributors (prime‑age, higher‑earning workers) stagnates or shrinks.

If the Somali‑origin population continues to grow in its current high‑dependency configuration (young, poor, heavily reliant on transfers), its aggregate net fiscal deficit will also grow.

It does not have to be the only driver of Minnesota’s long‑run fiscal stress to be a material contributor to a wider structural problem.

In the “Minneapolis Scenario”:

• Per‑capita social spending on Somali Minnesotans remains high or rises.

• The absolute number of Somali beneficiaries increases as the youth bulge ages into adulthood and has children.

• Meanwhile, the tax base is squeezed by:

  • Population aging;

  • Out‑migration of higher‑earning households if taxes rise faster than perceived value;

  • Slower productivity growth if large segments of the labor force remain low‑skill.

That combination points toward a long‑run risk of a fiscal grind:

• Repeated tax increases and new fees to sustain obligations;

• Growing resentment among net contributors;

• Political pressure for cuts that run straight into legal entitlements and community mobilization.

These projections do not attempt to model everything (e.g., broader ideological “American ethos” shifts, macro‑level federal bailouts).

They simply follow from:

• The current demographic structure;

• The observed fiscal position;

• The assumption that nothing major changes in educational performance, labor‑market integration, or program design.

On that basis, the Somali‑origin population in Minnesota is best understood, in purely fiscal terms, as a growing net liability whose impact is magnified by the state’s generosity and by broader demographic headwinds.

What the evidence supports (and what it does not)

The data in this report support the following:

1. On current trajectories, the Somali‑origin population in Minnesota is a net fiscal negative for the foreseeable future.

2. The community is on track to remain socio‑economically stratified, with a large share at or near the bottom of the income and education distribution.

3. Enclave dynamics, combined with generous and weakly policed transfer programs, have already produced systemic fraud and will likely do so again unless the program architecture changes.

4. The political system has begun to incorporate Somali networks as a patronage and turnout machine, tying public resources to a relatively cohesive, high‑dependency group.

The data do not guarantee that:

• Every Somali individual is dependent, criminal, or hostile to American norms. There is a growing professional cadre, and many ordinary families are simply trying to survive within the structures offered to them.

• Collapse or “takeover” of Minnesota is inevitable. The scenario described here assumes continuity in policy and behavior; different choices could alter the trajectory.

Strategic implications

If Minnesota continues to:

1. Attract and retain large numbers of low‑skill, high‑needs migrants from very different cultural systems,

2. Operate a high‑generosity, low‑verification welfare model, and

3. Allow enclaves to build parallel institutional ecosystems with minimal pressure to converge,

… then the logical expectation is a larger, more entrenched version of what already exists: a permanent fiscal and socio‑cultural drag concentrated in a small but strategically positioned population.

Reversing or even stabilizing that trajectory would require:

1. Hardening of program oversight: verification‑first design for all high‑risk transfers, with no ethnic exemptions and explicit tolerance for accusations of bias in the name of equal enforcement.

2. Targeted human‑capital investment with real conditionality: language, schooling, and workforce programs that link continued benefits to measurable progress, rather than simply increasing spending.

3. Clear legal red lines on parallel norms (FGM, polygyny, fraud) that are actually enforced, not just declared.

4. A candid reassessment of refugee and family‑reunification policy, including the fiscal and social capacity of Minnesota to absorb additional high‑needs populations.

Absent those shifts, the “Minneapolis Scenario” outlined here — a small, cohesive, and heavily subsidized ethnic bloc with outsize leverage over a shrinking tax base — is not alarmism. It is the straightforward extrapolation of the systems Minnesota has already built and the incentives currently in place.